0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

setting aside judgment? act promptly…

5 August 2014

In the case of Mohun-Smith V TBO Investments Ltd, judgment was entered after TBO failed to appear at the first day of trial. TBO had written to the court requesting an adjournment as its key witness was unavailable to give evidence. It then took TBO in excess of 10 days to make it’s application. Neither of these reasons were considered persuasive.

Pursuant to CPR 39.3(5), an application to set aside judgment in these circumstances must:

  1. be made promptly
  2. provide good reason for non-attendance; and
  3. show that the defendant has reasonably good prospects of success at trial.

Judge Seymour QC refused the application on the grounds that it had not been made promptly and the Court was not persuaded by the reasons for non-attendance; despite finding that TBO’s defence had reasonably good prospects of success.

Judge Seymour QC’s ruling demonstrates that conditions 1 and 2 are of utmost importance in such applications and acts a reminder that prompt action is essential when making an application to set aside judgment.

related opinions

IR35 changes - six months and counting...

In his 2018 Autumn Budget, the then Chancellor, Phillip Hammond, announced a significant change to the way liability for IR35 breaches will be dealt with for private sector companies from April 2020.

View blog

Court of Appeal confirms all employment tribunal judgments must be published on the register, except in national security cases

Under the ET Rules, all judgments and accompanying written reasons must be published on a pubic register which the general public can access online.

View blog

Marriott International: a look behind the ICO’s £99m fine and what this means for corporate acquisitions

Last month, the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) announced notice of its intention to fine (NOI) Marriott International, Inc. £99m for infringements of the GDPR.

View blog

Supreme Court backs employers seeking to enforce restrictive covenants: Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd

The Supreme Court in Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd has determined that where post-termination restrictive covenants (i.e. “non-compete” clauses) in employment contracts go further than reasonably necessary to protect an employer’s business interests, it can apply the ‘blue pencil test,’ severing the offending words and leaving the remaining enforceable clause in place.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up