0370 270 6000

Legal professional privilege v iniquity exception… who wins?

14 August 2014

In JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov & Others the Commercial Court held that a litigant’s strategy of concealment/deceit defeated any claim to privilege it may otherwise have over communications with its lawyers.

JSC sought disclosure of a number of documents held by the defendants’ former solicitors (who were each respondent to the application) that JSC considered these documents showed it had been defrauded of $4billion of judgments.

JSC’s application was made on the grounds that the defendants had pursued a strategy of lying/misleading the court as to the extent and nature of their assets; dealing with assets in breach of Orders; lying/misleading the court as to those transactions; and purposefully putting assets beyond the reach of JSC. JSC also alleged that each firm of solicitors had been used to further that strategy.

In hearing this application Popplewell J held that if iniquity put legal advice outside the scope of a professional engagement or rendered it an abuse of the professional relationship, communications relating to that iniquity could not attract legal professional privilege; demonstrating that privilege cannot be used as a shield against immoral and unjust behaviour.

Related opinions

The Future of Mediation

In an effort to build a stronger justice system, a shift in priorities has emerged away from adversarial court battles and more towards opportunities for consensual resolution. As one of the most popular forms of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), mediation has become increasingly encouraged.

View blog

Sequana: Supreme clarification on the duty owed to creditors

The Supreme Court has unanimously dismissed the BTI v Sequana appeal and reviewed the existence, content and engagement of the so-called ‘creditor duty’; being the point at which the interest of creditors is said to intrude upon the decision-making of directors of companies in financial distress.

View blog

Job applicant receives settlement due to unlawful age discrimination at interview

Janice Walsh applied for a job with Domino’s Pizza, hoping to secure a role as a Delivery Driver. However things quickly took a turn for the worse during her initial interview, with the very first question that she was asked relating to her age. Ms Walsh was ultimately informed that she had not been successful in her application.

View blog

Covid Rent Arrears: Cinema operators’ appeals dismissed

The Court of Appeal has dismissed two cases regarding rent arrears accrued during the Covid lockdowns. The cases are London Trocadero (2015) LLP v Picturehouse Cinemas Ltd and Bank of New York Mellon (International) Ltd v Cine-UK Ltd.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up