0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

hat-trick of Dunlop hearing loss claims bite the dust

31 July 2014

A third Dunlop noise induced hearing loss claim has bitten the dust this month. The case of SL v Goodyear Dunlop Tyres UK limited was discontinued and follows hot on the heels of discontinuances of MS and DD! All three claimants worked at the Dunlop Washington factory which closed down in 2006. Noise assessments and hearing protection documents covering the duration of employment were disclosed. The defendant obtained favourable medical reports on two claims and although they were denied leave to obtain their own medical report on SL, questions were put to the claimant’s expert. Responses by the claimant’s expert were inconsistent and mostly helpful to the defendant. The defendant made an application for the claimant’s expert to give oral evidence at the trial to enable cross examination by the defendant’s counsel; the claimant vehemently opposed the application but the court ordered the claimant’s expert to attend trial. A joint engineering report was obtained which was more favourable to the defendant. Meticulous research for historic documentation and witnesses plus good choice of experts and a robust approach means these claims can be successfully defended.

related opinions

World Menopause Day

To mark this, ACAS has produced new guidance for managing the menopause at work, providing advice on the symptoms and potential impact of the menopause and the types of support that can be offered.

View blog

Sexual Harassment in the workplace – consequences of getting it wrong

A partner at a Magic Circle law firm has this week been ordered to pay £235,000 in fines and costs by a disciplinary tribunal, having been found guilty of breaching his professional obligations.

View blog

High Court finds against WASPI women

The High Court has rejected the judicial review claim brought by the campaign group BackTo60 against the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP).

View blog

When does misconduct by a professional amount to professional misconduct?

The Court of Appeal has considered what amounts to professional conduct for the purposes of the MHPS in the case of Idu –v- The East Suffolk & North Essex NHS Foundation Trust.
The allegations raised against the Appellant surgeon included, amongst others, refusals to follow management instructions and inappropriate (rude, uncivil, and, on occasions, aggressive) verbal and written communications.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up