0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

mind the (pay) gap…

23 June 2014

Equal pay is back in the headlines with the publication of the draft Equality Act 2010 (Equal Pay Audits) Regulations 2014. Due to come into force in October, the regulations will oblige tribunals to order employers who have been found in breach of equal pay law under the Equality Act to carry out audits.

An audit would require the publication of gender pay information, the differences in pay between men and women and the reasons for those differences. It would also require the reasons for any potential equal pay breach identified by the audit and set out the plan to avoid such breaches.

Whilst it’s unlikely many employers would relish the idea of a mandatory audit, a voluntary audit can bring certainty and may uncover a few surprises. Few employers think they are discriminating in terms of pay but with figures from the Office for National Statistics showing women earning, on average, £5,000 less than men, it appears that the pay gap still exists.

related opinions

COVID-19 child protection practice - four months in - lessons learned so far

In June 2020 the University of Birmingham published a research briefing exploring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on child protection practice.

View blog

“Caution” is now the watchword when it comes to directly awarding public sectors contracts

The judicial review proceedings brought by the Good Law Project against the Department of Health and Social Care in relation to the £108m contract the Department awarded for PPE in April are about to shine a light on Regulation 32(2)(c) of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015.

View blog

Will there be a return of employment tribunal fees?

The Government is reportedly considering the reinstatement of tribunal fees in respect of employment claims.

View blog

Redundancy: competitive interview processes

In this case, the Respondent’s appeal was unsuccessful. In the first instance, the decision that it unfairly dismissed various claimants following the closure of the school where they worked. The Claimants were unsuccessful in applying for substantially similar positions at a new school that opened at the same site. Read more here.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up