0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

stop banging on…

17 April 2014

It can be frustrating when an employee raises a concern but continues to dogmatically pursue it even when the matter has concluded. But if the employee was ‘blowing the whistle’ any disciplinary action taken as a result could result in a detriment claim under section 47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996.

This was exactly the case in Panayiotou v Kernaghan. The Tribunal found that the claimant had raised a protected disclosure but would not accept any answer and continued to pursue the matter. As a result, the claimant became unmanageable and was dismissed. However, the Employment Appeal Tribunal held that the reason for the dismissal was the manner in which the claimant had pursued his complaints and that this was distinct from the protected disclosure. Therefore his claim failed.

The lesson to be learnt is that if you are disciplining an employee in these circumstances make it clear it is the manner of the disclosure, and not the disclosure itself, that is the act of misconduct.

related opinions

Retail ATMs and business rates: clarity at last!

Judgement has been handed down for the seminal case of Cardtronics UK Ltd and others (Respondents) v Sykes and others (Valuation Officers) (Appellants) [2020] UKSC 21.

View blog

Employer obliged to pay settlement despite employees confidentiality breach

In Duchy Farm Kennels Ltd v Steels the employer was found not to have been relieved of its obligation to pay a settlement sum, despite the former employee having breached the confidentiality clause contained in the settlement agreement.

View blog

Furlough scheme extended to October

The Chancellor announced on Tuesday 12th May 2020 that the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) is to be extended to the end of October.

View blog

Furlough and insolvency – are employees protected?

As more retailers and restauranteurs fall victim to insolvency, the Court of Appeal has confirmed that the contracts of employment of employees furloughed before a company is placed into administration will be treated as having been adopted by its administrators, therefore entitling the employees to “super-priority” status over other creditors.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up