0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

in good time

17 April 2014

A High Court judge has given further guidance as to the extent of the Mitchell judgment. In the case of Guidezone Limited v Kenena and 5 others, the Court was faced with the situation where a defence was due to be served by 14th February 2014 and a few days beforehand the defendants had asked for an extension of time making an application to the Court on 11th February.

At the hearing the claimant submitted that the Mitchell considerations should come into play. The judge took a different view saying that applications made in time should be dealt with in accordance with Part 3 of the CPR and the “overriding objective”. He said that to hold otherwise would effectively set “trip wires” and that had not been the intention of the Jackson reforms. As a result he granted the extension of time for serving the defence. As an aside he also encouraged parties to deal with reasonable requests in a co-operative fashion.

related opinions

Impact of Covid-19 upon level of fine

Two cases have considered the issue of Covid 19 as part of the sentencing exercise. In the most recent, failures by a principal contractor Modus Workspace, who design and refit refurbishments, led to a £1.1 million fine after an engineer was injured from a fall from a roof.

View blog

Important opportunity to comment on case law precedent

The UK government is considering extending this power to depart from retained EU case law to additional lower courts and tribunals, namely the Court of Appeal in England and Wales and the High Court of Justice in England and Wales and their equivalents.

View blog

Can an application to postpone a hearing be refused?

This case highlights the importance of Claimants obtaining their own medical evidence in such matters especially when it is pivotal to their claim.

View blog

A landlord’s promise, a tenant’s power

When it comes to leases, most people believe that landlords hold most of the power. However, in relation to long residential leases, the tables may well have recently turned in one respect at least following a recent Supreme Court decision.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up