0370 270 6000

In good time

17 April 2014

A High Court judge has given further guidance as to the extent of the Mitchell judgment. In the case of Guidezone Limited v Kenena and 5 others, the Court was faced with the situation where a defence was due to be served by 14th February 2014 and a few days beforehand the defendants had asked for an extension of time making an application to the Court on 11th February.

At the hearing the claimant submitted that the Mitchell considerations should come into play. The judge took a different view saying that applications made in time should be dealt with in accordance with Part 3 of the CPR and the “overriding objective”. He said that to hold otherwise would effectively set “trip wires” and that had not been the intention of the Jackson reforms. As a result he granted the extension of time for serving the defence. As an aside he also encouraged parties to deal with reasonable requests in a co-operative fashion.

Related opinions

Wide interpretation of “detriment” caused victimisation claim to succeed

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) decision in the case of Warburton v The Chief Constable.

View blog

Restrictive Covenants – are changes coming?

Restrictive covenants are widely recognised as a complex area of employment law that is of key importance to many organisations. However more recently, they have become a hot topic with the Government launching their consultation.

View blog

Are whistleblowers entitled to keep their employer’s confidential documents?

In Nissan v Passi, the High Court recently considered the issue of an employee retaining confidential documents belonging to his former employer in the context of the employer’s application for an injunction seeking the return of such documents from the employee.

View blog

Dealing with Covid Rent Arrears – an overview but no specifics

Following on from our recent article on the release of the updated Code of Practice for dealing with commercial rent arrears that have accrued throughout the pandemic, we continue to highlight what the overall principles seek to ensure - fairness and proportionality for both landlords and tenants across each step of the arbitration process.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up