0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

will reduced rehabilitation periods lead to higher employment?

19 February 2014

In a bid to enable former offenders to “turn their back on a life of crime” and “get back into honest work”, the Government has announced reforms which will reduce the length of time that low level convictions need to be disclosed when applying for certain jobs. The reforms, which are due to take effect on 10 March 2014, mean that some offences will only have to be disclosed for up to just two years after the completion of a custodial sentence.

Whilst this will be a welcome relief for those with criminal records who want to put the past behind them, offenders will still have to declare all previous convictions regardless of whether or not they are spent if, for example, they are applying for a job in a school or hospital. Also, given that jobs are still hard to come by, former offenders may not find it that easy to actually find employment despite the reforms.

related opinions

Furloughed employees entitled to full pay for redundancy purposes

The government has brought in new legislation to ensure that any employees who have been furloughed will have their statutory redundancy pay calculated based on their full-time wages as opposed their furloughed pay in the event that they are made redundant.

View blog

Return to work – all change or more of the same?

The Government has announced that its workplace guidance will change with effect from 1 August and its “work from home” message will be removed.

View blog

Will there be a return of employment tribunal fees?

The Government is reportedly considering the reinstatement of tribunal fees in respect of employment claims.

View blog

Redundancy: competitive interview processes

In this case, the Respondent’s appeal was unsuccessful. In the first instance, the decision that it unfairly dismissed various claimants following the closure of the school where they worked. The Claimants were unsuccessful in applying for substantially similar positions at a new school that opened at the same site. Read more here.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up