0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

will reduced rehabilitation periods lead to higher employment?

19 February 2014

In a bid to enable former offenders to “turn their back on a life of crime” and “get back into honest work”, the Government has announced reforms which will reduce the length of time that low level convictions need to be disclosed when applying for certain jobs. The reforms, which are due to take effect on 10 March 2014, mean that some offences will only have to be disclosed for up to just two years after the completion of a custodial sentence.

Whilst this will be a welcome relief for those with criminal records who want to put the past behind them, offenders will still have to declare all previous convictions regardless of whether or not they are spent if, for example, they are applying for a job in a school or hospital. Also, given that jobs are still hard to come by, former offenders may not find it that easy to actually find employment despite the reforms.

related opinions

World Menopause Day

To mark this, ACAS has produced new guidance for managing the menopause at work, providing advice on the symptoms and potential impact of the menopause and the types of support that can be offered.

View blog

Sexual Harassment in the workplace – consequences of getting it wrong

A partner at a Magic Circle law firm has this week been ordered to pay £235,000 in fines and costs by a disciplinary tribunal, having been found guilty of breaching his professional obligations.

View blog

High Court finds against WASPI women

The High Court has rejected the judicial review claim brought by the campaign group BackTo60 against the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP).

View blog

When does misconduct by a professional amount to professional misconduct?

The Court of Appeal has considered what amounts to professional conduct for the purposes of the MHPS in the case of Idu –v- The East Suffolk & North Essex NHS Foundation Trust.
The allegations raised against the Appellant surgeon included, amongst others, refusals to follow management instructions and inappropriate (rude, uncivil, and, on occasions, aggressive) verbal and written communications.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up