0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Supreme Court rules on environmental costs considerations

12 December 2013

The Supreme Court has ruled on appropriate costs following an ECJ reference as to the test to be applied to ensure that environmental judicial reviews were not prohibitively expensive.

A number of significant points could be extracted from the ECJ decision:

1. The test was not purely subjective and should not exceed the financial resources of the claimant, or “appear objectively unreasonable”

2. No definitive guidance has been given as to what is “objectively unreasonable”

3. The Court can take account of the “merits” of the case, including the prospect of success, importance to the claimant and environment, complexity of the relevant law, and potentially frivolous nature of the claim at different stages

4. That fact that the claimant pursued the claim does not determine the issue of costs

5. The same criteria applied on appeal as at first instance

This provides guidance when making costs submissions to the Court but whether costs are “prohibitively expensive” in any given case is still far from clear.

related opinions

Chancellor announces levy on companies subject to anti-money laundering regulations

The Chancellor’s latest Budget Report outlined that the Government will introduce a £100 million Economic Crime Levy, otherwise known as the AML Levy no earlier than April 2022 to fund action to tackle money laundering and ensure delivery of reforms in the Government’s Economic Crime Plan.

View blog

Retail woes extending beyond the property sector and into financial markets

Some commentators had anticipated that persisting retail sector challenges might disrupt more than the make-up of the high street or commercial property negotiations between landlords and tenants.

View blog

Does TUPE work for workers?

An Employment Tribunal has considered the definition of “employee” under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 and concluded that this definition is wide enough to cover those who would be more usually described within the UK as workers.

View blog

Staff Shortages in the NHS

Staff shortages within the NHS are well publicised, with recent press reports once again highlighting the additional impact of the NHS pensions “tax trap” on frontline care, and the uncertainty over Brexit implications for current and potential future employees.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up