0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Supreme Court rules on environmental costs considerations

12 December 2013

The Supreme Court has ruled on appropriate costs following an ECJ reference as to the test to be applied to ensure that environmental judicial reviews were not prohibitively expensive.

A number of significant points could be extracted from the ECJ decision:

1. The test was not purely subjective and should not exceed the financial resources of the claimant, or “appear objectively unreasonable”

2. No definitive guidance has been given as to what is “objectively unreasonable”

3. The Court can take account of the “merits” of the case, including the prospect of success, importance to the claimant and environment, complexity of the relevant law, and potentially frivolous nature of the claim at different stages

4. That fact that the claimant pursued the claim does not determine the issue of costs

5. The same criteria applied on appeal as at first instance

This provides guidance when making costs submissions to the Court but whether costs are “prohibitively expensive” in any given case is still far from clear.

related opinions

Consultation launched on the future of subsidy control law

The Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy has just launched its consultation on the future of subsidy control law (previously known as state aid) in the UK.

View blog

New Year, new-ish state aid rules

From 1 January 2021 the state aid principles set out in the Trade and Co-Operation Agreement are incorporated into law by the EU (Future Relationship) Act 2020.

View blog

Internal Market Bill published today – the start of the controversy?

The Internal Market Bill is published today, but amid much controversy.

View blog

Important opportunity to comment on case law precedent

The UK government is considering extending this power to depart from retained EU case law to additional lower courts and tribunals, namely the Court of Appeal in England and Wales and the High Court of Justice in England and Wales and their equivalents.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up