0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

some changes, but not much TUPE excited about

4 November 2013

The Government has finally published its proposed changes to the TUPE Regulations 2006. It claims the draft regulations will “cut red tape for businesses” but those hoping for a radical shake-up of the law in this area are likely to be disappointed.

As expected, the Government has abandoned its controversial plan to repeal the regulations relating to service provision changes (SPC), following a public consultation which began in January. The draft regulations now include the following reforms:

  • amending the definition of an SPC to bring it in line with case law – services carried on after a change must be “fundamentally or essentially the same” as those carried on before it
  • new rules on changing workplaces – a change in location following a transfer can amount to an economic, technical or organisational reason
  • employers will be able to renegotiate collective agreements provided that the negotiations start at least one year after the transfer and the overall changes are no less favourable to the employees.

related opinions

Anti-social media - but when is it work related?

As the use of social media continues to increase, its overlap with working life is becoming more and more prevalent.

View blog

IR35 changes - six months and counting...

In his 2018 Autumn Budget, the then Chancellor, Phillip Hammond, announced a significant change to the way liability for IR35 breaches will be dealt with for private sector companies from April 2020.

View blog

Court of Appeal confirms all employment tribunal judgments must be published on the register, except in national security cases

Under the ET Rules, all judgments and accompanying written reasons must be published on a pubic register which the general public can access online.

View blog

Supreme Court backs employers seeking to enforce restrictive covenants: Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd

The Supreme Court in Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd has determined that where post-termination restrictive covenants (i.e. “non-compete” clauses) in employment contracts go further than reasonably necessary to protect an employer’s business interests, it can apply the ‘blue pencil test,’ severing the offending words and leaving the remaining enforceable clause in place.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up