0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

new evidence - not grounds enough for an appeal

18 October 2013

In the case of Ogytogullari v Zaman, the Court of Appeal held that it was not appropriate to admit fresh evidence in an appeal because it was not possible to say that, had that evidence been before the lower court, it would probably have had an important influence on the outcome of the case.

This case involved a claim for misrepresentation, which had been supported, in part, by a witness of fact whom the lower court found to be unreliable. The appeal was based on further evidence from a second witness who collaborated the first witness’ evidence.

On hearing the appeal the court held that, the possible relevance of the fresh evidence had to be considered in the context of the case as a whole, including all other evidence before the court.

Accordingly, potential appellants must give careful consideration to the possible impact of new evidence before issuing an appeal, as the mere fact the evidence exists will not be enough for an appeal to succeed.

related opinions

Remote trials – here to stay?

With cross-country travel and in person gatherings largely prohibited due to the Covid-19 pandemic, the Courts are using remote or virtual trials to ensure the justice system ticks along.

View blog

Directors who fail to prepare, should prepare to fail

Two recent judgments demonstrate the risk that directors (of insolvent companies) face of being personally liable if appropriate records and procedures are not followed and if it cannot be shown that certain payments were in the interests of the company.

View blog

Remote mediation – here to stay?

Mediation has long been considered an effective method of alternative dispute resolution. With ‘in-person’ mediations no longer possible, remote or online mediations have risen to the fore.

View blog

Impact of Covid-19 upon level of fine

Two cases have considered the issue of Covid 19 as part of the sentencing exercise. In the most recent, failures by a principal contractor Modus Workspace, who design and refit refurbishments, led to a £1.1 million fine after an engineer was injured from a fall from a roof.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up