0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

impact of strict liability changes remains unclear

7 October 2013

Section 69 of The Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 (Health and Safety) has come into force for breaches which occur after the 1st October 2013. What does this mean? S.69 alters the duty of strict liability held under s.47(2) of the Heath and Safety at Work Act, where by a breach of health and safety at work will not be actionable in civil claims. Therefore, a claimant will now have to rely on the common law duties in order to bring a claim for breach of health and safety at work.

It does appear that there has been no risk impact assessment in relation to this matter nor have substantial regulations been introduced dealing with the introduction to this amendment.

Whilst the amendment will address the imbalance currently in favour of claimant’s, for instance where strict liability is imposed for unforeseen failure of work equipment, the overall impact on public authorities still remains unclear.

related opinions

IR35 changes - six months and counting...

In his 2018 Autumn Budget, the then Chancellor, Phillip Hammond, announced a significant change to the way liability for IR35 breaches will be dealt with for private sector companies from April 2020.

View blog

Marriott International: a look behind the ICO’s £99m fine and what this means for corporate acquisitions

Last month, the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) announced notice of its intention to fine (NOI) Marriott International, Inc. £99m for infringements of the GDPR.

View blog

SFO fail to secure individual criminal convictions following Deferred Prosecution Agreement

On 16 July 2019 the Serious Fraud Office released details of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement reached with Sarclad Ltd in July 2016.

View blog

Supreme Court backs employers seeking to enforce restrictive covenants: Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd

The Supreme Court in Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd has determined that where post-termination restrictive covenants (i.e. “non-compete” clauses) in employment contracts go further than reasonably necessary to protect an employer’s business interests, it can apply the ‘blue pencil test,’ severing the offending words and leaving the remaining enforceable clause in place.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up