0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

can a wide non-solicitation post-termination restriction be valid?

17 October 2013

A restrictive covenant preventing an ex-employee from soliciting customers from its former employer can be valid, even if the clause is not restricted to customers that the ex-employee has had recent dealings with.

In Coppage v Safety Net Services, Mr Coppage appealed against a decision that he had breached a non-solicitation clause. He argued that the clause was unreasonable, and therefore invalid, as it was not restricted to those customers he had dealt with in the last 12 months of his employment.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, stating there was nothing to suggest the trial judge had erred in deciding that the clause was reasonable overall. The fact that the covenant was limited to 6 months was a key factor.

The court reiterated that these cases are highly dependent on their specific facts. It is therefore important to remember that restrictive covenants will be void, unless the employer can show it has a legitimate business interest to protect and that the restriction goes no further than is reasonably necessary.

related opinions

Furloughed employees entitled to full pay for redundancy purposes

The government has brought in new legislation to ensure that any employees who have been furloughed will have their statutory redundancy pay calculated based on their full-time wages as opposed their furloughed pay in the event that they are made redundant.

View blog

Return to work – all change or more of the same?

The Government has announced that its workplace guidance will change with effect from 1 August and its “work from home” message will be removed.

View blog

Will there be a return of employment tribunal fees?

The Government is reportedly considering the reinstatement of tribunal fees in respect of employment claims.

View blog

Redundancy: competitive interview processes

In this case, the Respondent’s appeal was unsuccessful. In the first instance, the decision that it unfairly dismissed various claimants following the closure of the school where they worked. The Claimants were unsuccessful in applying for substantially similar positions at a new school that opened at the same site. Read more here.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up