0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

changes to employment tribunal remission system announced

10 September 2013

Hot on the heels of the launch of fees in July, the Government has announced the introduction of a revised remissions system.  Claimants may currently be entitled to full or part fee remission if they are in receipt of certain benefits or meet the gross annual or net monthly income tests.

The scheme, set to come into force in October, is intended to simplify the system, but also reduces the availability of fee remission in order to target assistance at those in the greatest need.  A disposable capital test is being introduced so that those with a high level of savings but with no or low annual income should pay the fee.

Clearly this is controversial, particularly coming so soon after the implementation of the new fee system.  Whilst these measures have the sensible aim of reducing the number of weak or vexatious claims, it will only impact those claimants who have money, and not necessarily those claimants whose claims are spurious or vexatious.

related opinions

Furloughed employees entitled to full pay for redundancy purposes

The government has brought in new legislation to ensure that any employees who have been furloughed will have their statutory redundancy pay calculated based on their full-time wages as opposed their furloughed pay in the event that they are made redundant.

View blog

Return to work – all change or more of the same?

The Government has announced that its workplace guidance will change with effect from 1 August and its “work from home” message will be removed.

View blog

Will there be a return of employment tribunal fees?

The Government is reportedly considering the reinstatement of tribunal fees in respect of employment claims.

View blog

Redundancy: competitive interview processes

In this case, the Respondent’s appeal was unsuccessful. In the first instance, the decision that it unfairly dismissed various claimants following the closure of the school where they worked. The Claimants were unsuccessful in applying for substantially similar positions at a new school that opened at the same site. Read more here.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up