0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

will the US trade representative veto a second time?

19 August 2013

In June this year, the United States International Trade Commission (ITC) ruled that certain Apple products such as the iPad 2 and iPhone 4, infringe Samsung patents relating to the transmission of data and so banned the importation and sale of these products.

However, the United States Trade Representative (USTR) then stepped in and vetoed the ban on policy grounds, citing the effect that the ban would otherwise have on the US economy and customers; the first veto of its kind since 1987.

The ITC has now issued a similar ban, but this time on Samsung products deemed to be infringing certain Apple patents. There are now 60 days for the USTR to decide whether or not to veto this ITC ban. Having already protected US-based Apple, there is pressure for the ITC to be fair in its treatment of Samsung as a foreign entity, so watch carefully to see what the ITC reaction is.

related opinions

Can an application to postpone a hearing be refused?

This case highlights the importance of Claimants obtaining their own medical evidence in such matters especially when it is pivotal to their claim.

View blog

A landlord’s promise, a tenant’s power

When it comes to leases, most people believe that landlords hold most of the power. However, in relation to long residential leases, the tables may well have recently turned in one respect at least following a recent Supreme Court decision.

View blog

Sky’s overly broad trade marks narrowed as found partially invalid for bad faith

Lord Justice Arnold has applied the guidance of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) to the evidence before him, in the long standing trade mark dispute between Sky and Skykick.

View blog

High Court extends employer’s duty of care to Dubai whistleblower

Employers with global networks which include a base in the UK should be aware that they can face expensive and damaging negligence claims from employees who are based overseas regardless of the whistleblowing regime.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up