0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

patent infringement threats!

1 August 2013

If you’re unjustifiably threatened with patent infringement and cease activities as a result, you can in certain circumstances bring an action and recover damages.

That’s precisely what happened here.

Clariant Produkte (Deutschland) GbmH, a well known manufacturer of organic pigments wrote to Sudarshan Chemical Industries Ltd (another such manufacturer) about one of Sudarshan’s products, saying:

Certainly you will not be interested in continuously effecting a patent infringement, which may involve the most serious penalties to the infringer and his customers

The Court of Appeal, having found the relevant patent to be invalid, considered the letter to be a groundless threat to Sudarshan’s customers (even though it was only sent to Sudarshan).

It also found that Clariant could not rely on a defence that when it made the threat it did not know that the patent was invalid, by imputing onto Clariant knowledge of its patent attorney and inventor.

A reminder of the risks associated with alleging patent infringement.

related opinions

AI: support for buying new technology

The world of healthtech and digitech is continuing to develop at pace and as a result of Covid-19 we are seeing it being used and implemented to a greater extent across the NHS and wider health and care market.

View blog

Impact of Covid-19 upon level of fine

Two cases have considered the issue of Covid 19 as part of the sentencing exercise. In the most recent, failures by a principal contractor Modus Workspace, who design and refit refurbishments, led to a £1.1 million fine after an engineer was injured from a fall from a roof.

View blog

Important opportunity to comment on case law precedent

The UK government is considering extending this power to depart from retained EU case law to additional lower courts and tribunals, namely the Court of Appeal in England and Wales and the High Court of Justice in England and Wales and their equivalents.

View blog

Sky’s overly broad trade marks narrowed as found partially invalid for bad faith

Lord Justice Arnold has applied the guidance of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) to the evidence before him, in the long standing trade mark dispute between Sky and Skykick.

View blog

Mark Daniels

Mark Daniels

Partner and Head of Business Services

View profile

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up