0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

the meaning of one establishment

4 July 2013

In a redundancy situation the duty to consult with employee representatives is engaged where 20 or more redundancies are proposed at one establishment within a period of 90 days. But what does 'one establishment' mean?

The EAT has confirmed in the case of USDAW v Woolworths that a purposive approach should be taken in line with the EU directive and construed 'establishment' as meaning the business of each employer as a whole irrespective of the fact that it might be carried on over multiple sites. Woolworths, as a business, had over 20 employees and therefore all staff should have been consulted even in those stores with fewer than 20 employees.

The case will have huge ramifications particularly for those in the retail sector with multiple stores. When embarking on a redundancy exercise, consider whether there are over 20 employees in total at risk of redundancy and whether any other employees have been made redundant in the preceding 90 days.

related opinions

Immigration rules post Brexit

Free movement between the UK and the EU ended on 31 December 2020. Since 1 January 2021, a new points-based immigration system applies to all migrants wanting to come to the UK, whether they are EU citizens or not.

View blog

“Please release me, let me go” Government to consult on removal of non-compete clauses

The Government has announced a consultation exercise into the possible removal of non-compete clauses in employment contracts which will run until 26 February 2021.

View blog

Increasing organisational resilience in maternity services

On 12 November 2020, the HSIB published its latest national investigation report on maternity safety - what are the likely implications for maternity services?

View blog

A landlord’s service charge certificate was conclusive as to the sums payable by a tenant under a lease

The Court of Appeal has ruled that the wording of a service charge clause precluded a tenant from challenging the sums claimed by a landlord.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up