0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

court action fails to prevent implementation of tribunal fees

11 July 2013

The Court of Session in Scotland has refused to grant an interim interdict (or injunction) which would have prevented the planned implementation of employment tribunal fees later this month.

A full hearing of the case will take place later this year. In the interim, the Lord Chancellor has given an undertaking that any fees paid after their introduction would be refunded (with interest) if the fee regime was held to be unlawful.

The new fees will come in as originally intended on 29th July, unless there is a successful appeal of this judgment or UNISON’s application for judicial review in the High Court is successful. UNISON’s argument is that the Government has acted in breach of EU law and that the fees regime will deny potential claimants access to justice.

This will be difficult to demonstrate, as the Government will rely on the need for public spending cuts across the board and that the fee remission scheme will allow access to the system for those of limited means.

related opinions

World Menopause Day

To mark this, ACAS has produced new guidance for managing the menopause at work, providing advice on the symptoms and potential impact of the menopause and the types of support that can be offered.

View blog

Sexual Harassment in the workplace – consequences of getting it wrong

A partner at a Magic Circle law firm has this week been ordered to pay £235,000 in fines and costs by a disciplinary tribunal, having been found guilty of breaching his professional obligations.

View blog

High Court finds against WASPI women

The High Court has rejected the judicial review claim brought by the campaign group BackTo60 against the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP).

View blog

When does misconduct by a professional amount to professional misconduct?

The Court of Appeal has considered what amounts to professional conduct for the purposes of the MHPS in the case of Idu –v- The East Suffolk & North Essex NHS Foundation Trust.
The allegations raised against the Appellant surgeon included, amongst others, refusals to follow management instructions and inappropriate (rude, uncivil, and, on occasions, aggressive) verbal and written communications.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up