0370 270 6000

Changes to judicial review of planning decisions

17 June 2013

On 1 July 2013 the Civil Procedure (Amendment No. 4) Rules 2013 will come into force making the following amendments to Parts 52 and 54 of the Civil Procedure Rules 1998:

  • applications to judicially review planning decisions will be reduced from a three month to a six week time limit
  • increased court fee from £60 to £215 for an oral hearing following a judicial review application being refused on the papers
  • no right to seek an oral hearing when a claim is held to be ‘totally without merit’.

The changes do not come without criticism.  Intended to reduce the rising number of judicial review applications and filter out ‘weak and ill-conceived’ applications, objectors question whether the change will result in claims being rushed to judicial review without any attempt being made to resolve the issues beforehand.

This change will however be welcomed by both developers and councils.

Related opinions

Procurement Bill — what’s new in 2022?

The Procurement Bill (the Bill) has now been with us for about four months, during which time there have been a huge number of amendments proposed in the House of Lords (circa 320). Lately, there has been less mention of it — unsurprising, really, given everything else going on in politics recently — but here’s a summary of some of the key issues and themes so far.

View blog

IR35 rules to be scrapped from April 2023

The Chancellor’s recent mini-budget provided a significant announcement for business as it was confirmed that the off-payroll working rules (known as “IR35”) put in place for public and private sector businesses from 2017 and 2021 will be scrapped from April 2023.

View blog

Cameras in convenience stores: a potential hornet’s nest..?

A convenience retailer has opted to install cameras (the “Facewatch” system) at a limited number of its English stores to reduce crime and protect its staff.

View blog

A helpful decision for claimant solicitors on Limitation under the Human Rights Act in abuse and assault cases?

In this month’s decision of CJ & Ors v Chief Constable of Wiltshire Police the court was given the task of considering whether a sexual abuse action, brought under the Human Rights Act 1998 should be allowed to proceed to trial where the claim had been brought outside the one-year period prescribed by the Act.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up