0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

changes to judicial review of planning decisions

17 June 2013

On 1 July 2013 the Civil Procedure (Amendment No. 4) Rules 2013 will come into force making the following amendments to Parts 52 and 54 of the Civil Procedure Rules 1998:

  • applications to judicially review planning decisions will be reduced from a three month to a six week time limit
  • increased court fee from £60 to £215 for an oral hearing following a judicial review application being refused on the papers
  • no right to seek an oral hearing when a claim is held to be ‘totally without merit’.

The changes do not come without criticism.  Intended to reduce the rising number of judicial review applications and filter out ‘weak and ill-conceived’ applications, objectors question whether the change will result in claims being rushed to judicial review without any attempt being made to resolve the issues beforehand.

This change will however be welcomed by both developers and councils.

related opinions

Internal Market Bill published today – the start of the controversy?

The Internal Market Bill is published today, but amid much controversy.

View blog

Important opportunity to comment on case law precedent

The UK government is considering extending this power to depart from retained EU case law to additional lower courts and tribunals, namely the Court of Appeal in England and Wales and the High Court of Justice in England and Wales and their equivalents.

View blog

COVID-19 child protection practice - four months in - lessons learned so far

In June 2020 the University of Birmingham published a research briefing exploring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on child protection practice.

View blog

“Caution” is now the watchword when it comes to directly awarding public sectors contracts

The judicial review proceedings brought by the Good Law Project against the Department of Health and Social Care in relation to the £108m contract the Department awarded for PPE in April are about to shine a light on Regulation 32(2)(c) of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up