0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

skills: sweet or savoury?

13 May 2013

The divergence of opinion in Whitehall over where skills funding should be administered from continues. Recent comments by Vince Cable have highlighted that he for one doesn’t think that such funding should be part of the new ‘single pot’ which Lord Heseltine was instrumental in gaining Treasury support for.

In this week’s Local Government Chronicle Lord Adonis describes the issue as a “massive Whitehall bunfight” and it doesn’t seem likely that it will be concluded anytime soon. The single pot is already less than Lord Heseltine had proposed, with his original suggestions combining upwards of £49 billion of funding. The Treasury announced in March this year that the new funding stream from 2015 would encompass some” funding for housing, transport and skills.

If Vince Cable’s Victoria sponge ends up having more weight than the Treasury’s cucumber sandwich then the significance of the single pot may start to be in doubt.

related opinions

IR35 changes - six months and counting...

In his 2018 Autumn Budget, the then Chancellor, Phillip Hammond, announced a significant change to the way liability for IR35 breaches will be dealt with for private sector companies from April 2020.

View blog

Marriott International: a look behind the ICO’s £99m fine and what this means for corporate acquisitions

Last month, the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) announced notice of its intention to fine (NOI) Marriott International, Inc. £99m for infringements of the GDPR.

View blog

Supreme Court backs employers seeking to enforce restrictive covenants: Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd

The Supreme Court in Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd has determined that where post-termination restrictive covenants (i.e. “non-compete” clauses) in employment contracts go further than reasonably necessary to protect an employer’s business interests, it can apply the ‘blue pencil test,’ severing the offending words and leaving the remaining enforceable clause in place.

View blog

Watch this space on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility

The concept of Assumption of Responsibility is on many stakeholders’ minds at the moment following the Supreme Court decision in CN & GN v Poole.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up