0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

skills: sweet or savoury?

13 May 2013

The divergence of opinion in Whitehall over where skills funding should be administered from continues. Recent comments by Vince Cable have highlighted that he for one doesn’t think that such funding should be part of the new ‘single pot’ which Lord Heseltine was instrumental in gaining Treasury support for.

In this week’s Local Government Chronicle Lord Adonis describes the issue as a “massive Whitehall bunfight” and it doesn’t seem likely that it will be concluded anytime soon. The single pot is already less than Lord Heseltine had proposed, with his original suggestions combining upwards of £49 billion of funding. The Treasury announced in March this year that the new funding stream from 2015 would encompass some” funding for housing, transport and skills.

If Vince Cable’s Victoria sponge ends up having more weight than the Treasury’s cucumber sandwich then the significance of the single pot may start to be in doubt.

related opinions

Developments overlooking other land are not a nuisance

Developers received welcome confirmation from the Court of Appeal this month that ‘overlooking’ (providing a view into another’s property) does not constitute a nuisance or invasion of privacy.

View blog

Should heading the ball be banned in football?

A report by experts from the University of Glasgow looking at deaths caused by neurodegenerative disease in former professional footballers in Scotland.

View blog

EHRC harassment guidance

The Equality and Human Rights Commission has issued technical guidance this month on Sexual harassment and harassment at work.

View blog

Supreme Court provides comfort to public authorities facing village green applications

In a lengthy majority judgment accompanied by two powerful dissenting opinions, the Supreme Court found yesterday that land acquired and held for statutory purposes cannot be registered as a village green where that registration is incompatible with the statutory purpose for which it is held.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up