0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

does the ACAS code apply to SOSR dismissals?

13 May 2013

The ACAS disciplinary code does not apply to non – disciplinary dismissals. This includes misconduct and performance but not usually dismissals for Some Other Substantial Reason (SOSR).

In Lund v St Edmunds School the claimant was dismissed for alienating his colleagues and affecting morale. The potentially fair reason was SOSR, which the tribunal found procedurally unfair. Mr Lund was not warned of the dismissal meeting or the opportunity to appeal. No uplift was made for the breach of the ACAS code.

The EAT disagreed. Whilst he was not dismissed for conduct reasons, it said the ACAS code did still apply. His claim concerned his conduct which led his employers to consider whether he should be dismissed.

Employers should therefore think before assuming the code does not apply. However, they should also remember even where it does not apply, a failure to follow it is likely to mean that general principles of fairness have not been achieved; going to the reasonableness of the decision to dismiss.

related opinions

COVID-19 child protection practice - four months in - lessons learned so far

In June 2020 the University of Birmingham published a research briefing exploring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on child protection practice.

View blog

“Caution” is now the watchword when it comes to directly awarding public sectors contracts

The judicial review proceedings brought by the Good Law Project against the Department of Health and Social Care in relation to the £108m contract the Department awarded for PPE in April are about to shine a light on Regulation 32(2)(c) of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015.

View blog

Will there be a return of employment tribunal fees?

The Government is reportedly considering the reinstatement of tribunal fees in respect of employment claims.

View blog

Redundancy: competitive interview processes

In this case, the Respondent’s appeal was unsuccessful. In the first instance, the decision that it unfairly dismissed various claimants following the closure of the school where they worked. The Claimants were unsuccessful in applying for substantially similar positions at a new school that opened at the same site. Read more here.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up