0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Does the ACAS code apply to SOSR dismissals?

13 May 2013

The ACAS disciplinary code does not apply to non – disciplinary dismissals. This includes misconduct and performance but not usually dismissals for Some Other Substantial Reason (SOSR).

In Lund v St Edmunds School the claimant was dismissed for alienating his colleagues and affecting morale. The potentially fair reason was SOSR, which the tribunal found procedurally unfair. Mr Lund was not warned of the dismissal meeting or the opportunity to appeal. No uplift was made for the breach of the ACAS code.

The EAT disagreed. Whilst he was not dismissed for conduct reasons, it said the ACAS code did still apply. His claim concerned his conduct which led his employers to consider whether he should be dismissed.

Employers should therefore think before assuming the code does not apply. However, they should also remember even where it does not apply, a failure to follow it is likely to mean that general principles of fairness have not been achieved; going to the reasonableness of the decision to dismiss.

Related opinions

Evidence of guilt not always required for fair dismissal

This case offers particularly helpful guidance for employers when being faced with employees who are suspected of criminal wrongdoing, albeit care should always be given to ensure allegations are clearly defined and considered on their own merits.

View blog

Handing back an empty shell of a building did not prevent a tenant from exercising a break clause

Break rights have proved a fertile source of litigation over the last few years. More often than not, tenants have found themselves on the wrong end of the decisions. However, a Court of Appeal decision yesterday has bucked that trend.

View blog

Flexible working, childcare and indirect sex discrimination – important reminder

The courts have long recognised that, on a societal level, women bear a greater burden of childcare responsibilities than men which can make it more difficult for women to comply with employer requirements for flexible working (known as the ‘childcare disparity’).

View blog

School not liable for reckless actions of a student

The decision reinforces that the standard of the duty of care owed by schools is one or reasonableness.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up