0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

post termination victimisation

7 March 2013

Rowstock Ltd v Jessemey is the most recent case in a line of authorities to consider the Equality Act and claims of post termination victimisation.

Following a Tribunal claim for unfair dismissal and age discrimination, the claimant’s employer provided him with an unfavourable reference. Unsurprisingly he sought to bring a claim for victimisation. Both the Tribunal and the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) agreed with the respondent that s.108(7) Equality Act 2010 specifically excludes a claim of victimisation in circumstances where the employment relationship has ended and therefore the claim must fail. This is not compatible with the Equal Treatment Directive but the EAT felt it was outside their remit to construe the subsection in a manner that was directly opposite to that which had been expressed in the Act.

Permission to appeal has been granted but it is likely that an amendment to the Equality Act will be required to rectify this anomaly.

related opinions

“Caution” is now the watchword when it comes to directly awarding public sectors contracts

The judicial review proceedings brought by the Good Law Project against the Department of Health and Social Care in relation to the £108m contract the Department awarded for PPE in April are about to shine a light on Regulation 32(2)(c) of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015.

View blog

Will there be a return of employment tribunal fees?

The Government is reportedly considering the reinstatement of tribunal fees in respect of employment claims.

View blog

Redundancy: competitive interview processes

In this case, the Respondent’s appeal was unsuccessful. In the first instance, the decision that it unfairly dismissed various claimants following the closure of the school where they worked. The Claimants were unsuccessful in applying for substantially similar positions at a new school that opened at the same site. Read more here.

View blog

Can an application to postpone a hearing be refused?

This case highlights the importance of Claimants obtaining their own medical evidence in such matters especially when it is pivotal to their claim.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up