0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

the limitation pendulum

12 November 2012

The limitation pendulum swings regularly between claimant and defendant but the decision in Johnson v MOD is an indication that the swing is presently towards the defendant.

Johnson appealed a decision that by 2001 he had known that his hearing loss had been contributed to by exposure to noise between 1965-79.

The Court of Appeal agreed that the claimant did not have actual knowledge by 2001, but following the demanding test in Adams v Bracknell Forest 2004 a reasonable person would have been sufficiently curious as to the cause of his significant condition so as to be deemed by 2002 to have had (constructive) knowledge that the cause of his condition was noise induced deafness.

related opinions

“Caution” is now the watchword when it comes to directly awarding public sectors contracts

The judicial review proceedings brought by the Good Law Project against the Department of Health and Social Care in relation to the £108m contract the Department awarded for PPE in April are about to shine a light on Regulation 32(2)(c) of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015.

View blog

Can an application to postpone a hearing be refused?

This case highlights the importance of Claimants obtaining their own medical evidence in such matters especially when it is pivotal to their claim.

View blog

A landlord’s promise, a tenant’s power

When it comes to leases, most people believe that landlords hold most of the power. However, in relation to long residential leases, the tables may well have recently turned in one respect at least following a recent Supreme Court decision.

View blog

High Court extends employer’s duty of care to Dubai whistleblower

Employers with global networks which include a base in the UK should be aware that they can face expensive and damaging negligence claims from employees who are based overseas regardless of the whistleblowing regime.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up