0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

squatters rights curtailed

31 August 2012

On 1st September 2012 s.144 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 comes into force to create, in certain circumstances, a new offence of squatting in a residential building.

A trespasser commits the offence if they enter residential premises as a trespasser; the person knows or ought to know they are a trespasser and the person is living in the building or intends to live there for any period.

The new offence will be of limited use to social landlords. For example, if a tenant unlawfully sub-lets the property to another occupant then it is unlikely that the offence will have been committed because the occupants will have entered the property with the consent of the tenant and not as trespassers.

In the cases where s.144 applies, it will be important to have a good line of communication with the police so that when any arrests are made the landlord will be in the locality with a locksmith to re-secure their property.

related opinions

COVID-19 child protection practice - four months in - lessons learned so far

In June 2020 the University of Birmingham published a research briefing exploring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on child protection practice.

View blog

“Caution” is now the watchword when it comes to directly awarding public sectors contracts

The judicial review proceedings brought by the Good Law Project against the Department of Health and Social Care in relation to the £108m contract the Department awarded for PPE in April are about to shine a light on Regulation 32(2)(c) of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015.

View blog

Will there be a return of employment tribunal fees?

The Government is reportedly considering the reinstatement of tribunal fees in respect of employment claims.

View blog

Redundancy: competitive interview processes

In this case, the Respondent’s appeal was unsuccessful. In the first instance, the decision that it unfairly dismissed various claimants following the closure of the school where they worked. The Claimants were unsuccessful in applying for substantially similar positions at a new school that opened at the same site. Read more here.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up