0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

preliminary victory for Mr O’Brien – what next for Part Time Judicial Pensions?

11 July 2012

On 4 July a Supreme Court hearing took place to consider whether Mr O’Brien’s relationship with the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) is not substantially different to that of a typical ‘employer’ / ‘worker’ relationship. This week, the Court gave a preliminary ruling that Mr O’Brien is a ‘worker’. This signifies a major step towards achieving pensions for part time judges. Mr O’Brien was represented by Rachel Crasnow and Robin Allen QC instructed by Edward Benson, Employment Partner at Browne Jacobson.

Rather than remitting the issue of Objective Justification to the Employment Tribunal for consideration, the Court has also requested that the MoJ substantiate its case on the issue – the last remaining defence open to it. The case has been listed for a further hearing in November.

related opinions

Anti-social media - but when is it work related?

As the use of social media continues to increase, its overlap with working life is becoming more and more prevalent.

View blog

IR35 changes - six months and counting...

In his 2018 Autumn Budget, the then Chancellor, Phillip Hammond, announced a significant change to the way liability for IR35 breaches will be dealt with for private sector companies from April 2020.

View blog

Court of Appeal confirms all employment tribunal judgments must be published on the register, except in national security cases

Under the ET Rules, all judgments and accompanying written reasons must be published on a pubic register which the general public can access online.

View blog

Supreme Court backs employers seeking to enforce restrictive covenants: Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd

The Supreme Court in Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd has determined that where post-termination restrictive covenants (i.e. “non-compete” clauses) in employment contracts go further than reasonably necessary to protect an employer’s business interests, it can apply the ‘blue pencil test,’ severing the offending words and leaving the remaining enforceable clause in place.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up