0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

preliminary victory for Mr O’Brien – what next for Part Time Judicial Pensions?

11 July 2012

On 4 July a Supreme Court hearing took place to consider whether Mr O’Brien’s relationship with the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) is not substantially different to that of a typical ‘employer’ / ‘worker’ relationship. This week, the Court gave a preliminary ruling that Mr O’Brien is a ‘worker’. This signifies a major step towards achieving pensions for part time judges. Mr O’Brien was represented by Rachel Crasnow and Robin Allen QC instructed by Edward Benson, Employment Partner at Browne Jacobson.

Rather than remitting the issue of Objective Justification to the Employment Tribunal for consideration, the Court has also requested that the MoJ substantiate its case on the issue – the last remaining defence open to it. The case has been listed for a further hearing in November.

related opinions

Will there be a return of employment tribunal fees?

The Government is reportedly considering the reinstatement of tribunal fees in respect of employment claims.

View blog

Redundancy: competitive interview processes

In this case, the Respondent’s appeal was unsuccessful. In the first instance, the decision that it unfairly dismissed various claimants following the closure of the school where they worked. The Claimants were unsuccessful in applying for substantially similar positions at a new school that opened at the same site. Read more here.

View blog

Can an application to postpone a hearing be refused?

This case highlights the importance of Claimants obtaining their own medical evidence in such matters especially when it is pivotal to their claim.

View blog

Employer obliged to pay settlement despite employees confidentiality breach

In Duchy Farm Kennels Ltd v Steels the employer was found not to have been relieved of its obligation to pay a settlement sum, despite the former employee having breached the confidentiality clause contained in the settlement agreement.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up