0370 270 6000

No succession rights for children of joint tenants

25 July 2012

The Supreme Court has issued its key ruling on succession to tenancies.

In 1980 Mr and Mrs Hickin became secure tenants of a council property they had lived in with their daughter since 1967. Mr Hickin eventually left the property and in 2007 Mrs Hickin died.

Their daughter challenged Solihull Council’s possession proceedings against her claiming that the tenancy had vested in her by virtue of succession.

The Supreme Court ordered possession in favour of the Council, confirming that the transfer to Mr Hickin acted as though it was a succession so that no further successions were possible.

Some social landlords may have granted the daughter a voluntary “non-statutory” succession. However, there are cases where they will not want to do this. For example, if the property’s size makes it more appropriate for it to be occupied by a family.

This decision will be another tool to help social landlords ensure that the most appropriate occupants are tenants in the right type of property.

Related opinions

Building Safety Bill receives Royal Assent

The new regime introduced by the Act will take shape over the next 18 months, but those who design, build or manage high rise buildings are being urged to get ready for the changes to be introduced through the act.

View blog

Building Safety Bill amendments

In March the government proposed a number of changes to the Building Safety Bill. The new amendments propose additional protection for leaseholders to prevent them from being charged for cladding work if they own up to three properties.

View blog

HSE Campaign Targets Construction Industry in Birmingham

The HSE has announced a campaign targeting health and safety in the construction industry in Birmingham. The Campaign is in response to a significant increase in development across the city, partly as a result of preparations for the 2022 Commonwealth Games.

View blog

Care home worker fairly dismissed for refusing Covid-19 vaccination

The Tribunal considered whether a care home worker was unfairly dismissed following her refusal to be vaccinated against Covid-19. It is important to note the Claimant’s dismissal pre-dated the compulsory vaccination regulations in force from November 2021.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up