0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

in house awards again..

26 July 2012

Advocate General Cruz Villalón has delivered his opinion on the feasibility for the Teckal Exemption to be available to bodies that hold only a token shareholding in a shared service company.

Villalón confirmed that it was unimportant whether the holding was a minority shareholding provided that the shareholding agreement gave effective and proportionate control over the company to all the shareholders.

What is more interesting is his references to the earlier decision of Sea Srl V Commune di Ponte Nossa and the ability of Teckal Companies to be established with the mere future possibility of private sector involvement.

Villalón suggests that if the private sector becomes involved in the ownership of the company at some point after award it would be impossible from the outset for the requirement of control to be satisfied.

What this practically means is debatable. However, we will need to think carefully about what type of companies are set up and how future intensions are expressed.

related opinions

EHRC harassment guidance

The Equality and Human Rights Commission has issued technical guidance this month on Sexual harassment and harassment at work.

View blog

More protection required for retailer workers as violence is on the rise, according to latest statistics

Following an MP debate on 5 November 2019, the government is due to release long-awaited guidance as to how it intends to protect workers in the retail industry against violence, harassment and abuse.

View blog

Beards: Smart or Not?

In Sethi v Elements Personnel Services Limited, the Employment Tribunal has considered the implications of dress codes on men.

View blog

Supreme Court provides comfort to public authorities facing village green applications

In a lengthy majority judgment accompanied by two powerful dissenting opinions, the Supreme Court found yesterday that land acquired and held for statutory purposes cannot be registered as a village green where that registration is incompatible with the statutory purpose for which it is held.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up