Please sign in with your existing account details.
Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.
Privacy statement - Terms and conditions
Forgotten your password?
You have exceeded the maximum number of login attempts for this email address and your account has been locked. An email has been sent to member of Browne Jacobson's web team and some one will be contacting you over the next two working days with details of how to change your password.
Are you sure you want to remove this item from you pinned content?
In a survey commissioned by Action for Children ¾ agreed there was no common understanding of what was meant by “good enough” parenting and 2/3rds felt the law was confusing.
Do we really need more “law on parenting”? The Children Act 1989 is sufficiently clear. It’s the practical application that makes the difference. Our experience suggests that where practitioners are unable, because of lack of resources, to provide support for families who are struggling to look after their children, a significant proportion become the subject of Care Proceedings.
Action for Children suggests courts should be able to order parents to undergo treatment, counselling or parenting courses. The questions arise; which courts? In which contexts? At who’s expense?
There are some great ideas here, but the amount of investment an overhaul of existing systems requires to implement it would be significant. Better to enable CYPDs to work with families at a much earlier stage so that they do not reach crisis.
The Debt Respite Scheme (Breathing Space Moratorium and Mental Health Crisis Moratorium) (England and Wales) Regulations 2020 is due to come into force on 4 May 2021. It’s a snappy title but what exactly is it?
View blog
In June 2020 the University of Birmingham published a research briefing exploring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on child protection practice.
Nazareth Care Charitable Trust which operates a care home in Bonnyrigg, Scotland, recently received a fine after a resident at one of its care homes suffered a fatal injury after falling down a flight of stairs.
The concept of Assumption of Responsibility is on many stakeholders’ minds at the moment following the Supreme Court decision in CN & GN v Poole.
Partner
Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.
Sign up