0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

mandatory retirement policies judged acceptable – in some cases

27 April 2012

The Supreme Court’s judgment in Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes concerns the scope for justifying a mandatory retirement age for partners. Unless justified, mandatory retirement would be direct discrimination because of age. Although Mr Seldon’s appeal was dismissed, this doesn’t give employers the green light to enforce retirement; employers still have to ensure that such a policy is ‘proportionate’. Mr Seldon’s case has been remitted to the Employment Tribunal to decide this.

The Court signalled that ‘succession planning’ (i.e. sharing employment opportunities fairly between generations) and limiting the need to expel partners by way of performance management were both legitimate aims which could justify mandatory retirement. Both of these aims have been accepted by the European Court as consistent with Council Directive 2000/78/EC.

The judgment balances the business needs against employee rights – precisely the intention of the Directive; but it does little to help employers know whether they can safely impose retirement ages.

related opinions

Anti-social media - but when is it work related?

As the use of social media continues to increase, its overlap with working life is becoming more and more prevalent.

View blog

IR35 changes - six months and counting...

In his 2018 Autumn Budget, the then Chancellor, Phillip Hammond, announced a significant change to the way liability for IR35 breaches will be dealt with for private sector companies from April 2020.

View blog

Court of Appeal confirms all employment tribunal judgments must be published on the register, except in national security cases

Under the ET Rules, all judgments and accompanying written reasons must be published on a pubic register which the general public can access online.

View blog

Supreme Court backs employers seeking to enforce restrictive covenants: Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd

The Supreme Court in Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd has determined that where post-termination restrictive covenants (i.e. “non-compete” clauses) in employment contracts go further than reasonably necessary to protect an employer’s business interests, it can apply the ‘blue pencil test,’ severing the offending words and leaving the remaining enforceable clause in place.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up