0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Mandatory retirement policies judged acceptable – in some cases

27 April 2012

The Supreme Court’s judgment in Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes concerns the scope for justifying a mandatory retirement age for partners. Unless justified, mandatory retirement would be direct discrimination because of age. Although Mr Seldon’s appeal was dismissed, this doesn’t give employers the green light to enforce retirement; employers still have to ensure that such a policy is ‘proportionate’. Mr Seldon’s case has been remitted to the Employment Tribunal to decide this.

The Court signalled that ‘succession planning’ (i.e. sharing employment opportunities fairly between generations) and limiting the need to expel partners by way of performance management were both legitimate aims which could justify mandatory retirement. Both of these aims have been accepted by the European Court as consistent with Council Directive 2000/78/EC.

The judgment balances the business needs against employee rights – precisely the intention of the Directive; but it does little to help employers know whether they can safely impose retirement ages.

Related opinions

Status and Substitution

In Stuart Delivery Ltd v Augustine, the Court of Appeal was asked to consider the principles governing when the ability to appoint a substitute negated the obligation to personally perform work.

View blog

Symptoms of menopause can constitute a disability

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) recently found that an employment tribunal was wrong to strike out a claim on grounds that menopausal symptoms did not amount to a disability under the Equality Act 2010 (Rooney v Leicester City Council).

View blog

Employment Appeal Tribunal rules no entitlement to pay for zero-hour worker during a period of suspension

In a recent case the Employment Appeal Tribunal determined that, as a zero-hour worker, the Claimant was not entitled to be paid whilst he was suspended pending an investigation into an allegation of misconduct.

View blog

Flexible working and leave for carers

The Government has launched a consultation today on potential changes to the statutory flexible working regime.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up