0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

government considers compensated no-fault dismissals for micro-businesses

16 March 2012

The Government has published a call for evidence to gather views on whether current dismissal procedures are too onerous and complex and the idea of a compensated no – fault dismissal procedure for “micro-businesses” with fewer than 10 employees.

A compensated no-fault dismissal procedure would allow micro-businesses to dismiss an employee where no fault has been identified on the part of the employee, provided that the employee receives a set amount of compensation. Employees dismissed through compensated no-fault dismissal would not be able to claim unfair dismissal but could still bring automatic unfair dismissal claims and discrimination claims.

This proposal will give small employers the confidence to dismiss employees who may be underperforming or simply isn’t fitting in to the organisation without following a ‘fair’ dismissal process.

Whilst employees are unlikely to see the benefit of the proposal, it provides an opportunity for dismissed employees to move on with no fault attributed to them and some compensation to help them when looking for a new job.

related opinions

World Menopause Day

To mark this, ACAS has produced new guidance for managing the menopause at work, providing advice on the symptoms and potential impact of the menopause and the types of support that can be offered.

View blog

Sexual Harassment in the workplace – consequences of getting it wrong

A partner at a Magic Circle law firm has this week been ordered to pay £235,000 in fines and costs by a disciplinary tribunal, having been found guilty of breaching his professional obligations.

View blog

High Court finds against WASPI women

The High Court has rejected the judicial review claim brought by the campaign group BackTo60 against the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP).

View blog

When does misconduct by a professional amount to professional misconduct?

The Court of Appeal has considered what amounts to professional conduct for the purposes of the MHPS in the case of Idu –v- The East Suffolk & North Essex NHS Foundation Trust.
The allegations raised against the Appellant surgeon included, amongst others, refusals to follow management instructions and inappropriate (rude, uncivil, and, on occasions, aggressive) verbal and written communications.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up