0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

ECJ ruling in O’Brien – what does the future hold for Part Time Judicial Pensions?

8 March 2012

On 1 March the CJEU decided that whilst the Part Time Workers Directive allows Member States to apply national law to interpret ‘worker’, the interpretation must respect the effectiveness of the Directive and the general principles of EU law and must not exclude whole categories of workers from its protection. The fact that judges are office-holders under national law does not stop them being workers, and classifying judges as workers does not undermine the independence of the judiciary. It was irrelevant that part-time salaried judges receive pensions, and that full-time judges cannot practise as solicitors or barristers whereas part-time fee paid judges can.

The matter will be referred back to the Supreme Court to assess whether the nature of the employment relationship in question is substantially different from the traditional employer/ ‘worker’ relationship – if Mr O’Brien is successful, this will open the flood gates for thousands of claims.

Rachel Crasnow and Robin Allen QC instructed by Edward Benson of our Employment Team, represented Mr O’Brien.

related opinions

Will there be a return of employment tribunal fees?

The Government is reportedly considering the reinstatement of tribunal fees in respect of employment claims.

View blog

Redundancy: competitive interview processes

In this case, the Respondent’s appeal was unsuccessful. In the first instance, the decision that it unfairly dismissed various claimants following the closure of the school where they worked. The Claimants were unsuccessful in applying for substantially similar positions at a new school that opened at the same site. Read more here.

View blog

Can an application to postpone a hearing be refused?

This case highlights the importance of Claimants obtaining their own medical evidence in such matters especially when it is pivotal to their claim.

View blog

Employer obliged to pay settlement despite employees confidentiality breach

In Duchy Farm Kennels Ltd v Steels the employer was found not to have been relieved of its obligation to pay a settlement sum, despite the former employee having breached the confidentiality clause contained in the settlement agreement.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up