0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

ECJ ruling in O’Brien – what does the future hold for Part Time Judicial Pensions?

8 March 2012

On 1 March the CJEU decided that whilst the Part Time Workers Directive allows Member States to apply national law to interpret ‘worker’, the interpretation must respect the effectiveness of the Directive and the general principles of EU law and must not exclude whole categories of workers from its protection. The fact that judges are office-holders under national law does not stop them being workers, and classifying judges as workers does not undermine the independence of the judiciary. It was irrelevant that part-time salaried judges receive pensions, and that full-time judges cannot practise as solicitors or barristers whereas part-time fee paid judges can.

The matter will be referred back to the Supreme Court to assess whether the nature of the employment relationship in question is substantially different from the traditional employer/ ‘worker’ relationship – if Mr O’Brien is successful, this will open the flood gates for thousands of claims.

Rachel Crasnow and Robin Allen QC instructed by Edward Benson of our Employment Team, represented Mr O’Brien.

related opinions

Home Office Central Registry for modern slavery statement goes live - first universities publish statements

The Home Office recently launched a central registry for modern slavery statements. A growing number of educational organisations, including a number of universities, have published statements on the registry.

View blog

Equal pay at ASDA stores - appeal to the Supreme Court unsuccessful

35,000 workers working in ASDA’s retail business sought to compare themselves to workers at distribution depots for equal pay purposes. Find out more about this Employment Appeal Tribunal.

View blog

Supreme Court confirms that sleep ins are not working time

The Supreme Court judgment represents the conclusion on whether or not “sleep in time” should be classified as working time, when calculating the National Minimum Wage (NMW).

View blog

Mencap case: No entitlement to National Minimum Wage for sleep-in shifts

In a pivotal and much anticipated judgment for the social care sector, the Supreme Court has ruled that workers are not entitled to the National Minimum Wage for all time spent on a sleep-in shift.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up