0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

ECJ ruling in O’Brien – what does the future hold for Part Time Judicial Pensions?

8 March 2012

On 1 March the CJEU decided that whilst the Part Time Workers Directive allows Member States to apply national law to interpret ‘worker’, the interpretation must respect the effectiveness of the Directive and the general principles of EU law and must not exclude whole categories of workers from its protection. The fact that judges are office-holders under national law does not stop them being workers, and classifying judges as workers does not undermine the independence of the judiciary. It was irrelevant that part-time salaried judges receive pensions, and that full-time judges cannot practise as solicitors or barristers whereas part-time fee paid judges can.

The matter will be referred back to the Supreme Court to assess whether the nature of the employment relationship in question is substantially different from the traditional employer/ ‘worker’ relationship – if Mr O’Brien is successful, this will open the flood gates for thousands of claims.

Rachel Crasnow and Robin Allen QC instructed by Edward Benson of our Employment Team, represented Mr O’Brien.

related opinions

Disability pay gap

For the first time, the Office for National Statistics (“ONS”) has analysed pay gaps between disabled and non-disabled employees in the UK using newly reweighted earnings data from the Annual Population Survey.

View blog

Does TUPE work for workers?

An Employment Tribunal has considered the definition of “employee” under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 and concluded that this definition is wide enough to cover those who would be more usually described within the UK as workers.

View blog

Supreme Court extends whistle-blower protection

The decision of the Supreme Court extends the scope of whistle-blower protection and is a wider approach than that taken in direct discrimination claims.

View blog

Capability – the cost of getting it wrong

An 89 year old former patient pathway co-ordinator has been awarded £200,000 by an Employment Tribunal for unfair dismissal and age and disability discrimination following her dismissal on capability grounds.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up