0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

ECJ ruling in O’Brien – what does the future hold for Part Time Judicial Pensions?

8 March 2012

On 1 March the CJEU decided that whilst the Part Time Workers Directive allows Member States to apply national law to interpret ‘worker’, the interpretation must respect the effectiveness of the Directive and the general principles of EU law and must not exclude whole categories of workers from its protection. The fact that judges are office-holders under national law does not stop them being workers, and classifying judges as workers does not undermine the independence of the judiciary. It was irrelevant that part-time salaried judges receive pensions, and that full-time judges cannot practise as solicitors or barristers whereas part-time fee paid judges can.

The matter will be referred back to the Supreme Court to assess whether the nature of the employment relationship in question is substantially different from the traditional employer/ ‘worker’ relationship – if Mr O’Brien is successful, this will open the flood gates for thousands of claims.

Rachel Crasnow and Robin Allen QC instructed by Edward Benson of our Employment Team, represented Mr O’Brien.

related opinions

High Court finds against WASPI women

The High Court has rejected the judicial review claim brought by the campaign group BackTo60 against the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP).

View blog

When does misconduct by a professional amount to professional misconduct?

The Court of Appeal has considered what amounts to professional conduct for the purposes of the MHPS in the case of Idu –v- The East Suffolk & North Essex NHS Foundation Trust.
The allegations raised against the Appellant surgeon included, amongst others, refusals to follow management instructions and inappropriate (rude, uncivil, and, on occasions, aggressive) verbal and written communications.

View blog

Vegetarianism is not a philosophical belief under the Equality Act 2010

In its Judgment earlier this month, the Tribunal considered whether vegetarianism is capable of being a philosophical belief capable of protection under the Equality Act 2010.

View blog

Time to increase the £25,000 cap on contractual claims in the Employment Tribunal?

The recent case of Ugradar v Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust has highlighted that the current cap on contractual claims that can be awarded in the Employment Tribunals is outdated and capable of producing real injustice.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up