0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

collective redundancy - latest position

26 March 2012

When a decision is made by a parent company that may result in redundancies, when does the subsidiary need to start collective redundancy consultation? The Advocate General’s opinion in United States of America v Nolan is, when a strategic or commercial decision is taken which compels the employer to contemplate or plan redundancies. The A-G’s opinion is not always followed by the ECJ, but usually will be.

The case of UK Coal Mining v NUM had indicated that consultation needed to start before the decision which may result in redundancies had been taken (e.g. a decision to close a site). This hasn’t been expressly rejected by the A-G’s opinion, but it appears to have been diluted, which is good news for employers.

The European law on this point has been unclear to say the least, and this opinion only helps as far as saying that consultation should not be started too soon or too late. Deciding when exactly that is might not be so simple.

related opinions

Furloughed employees entitled to full pay for redundancy purposes

The government has brought in new legislation to ensure that any employees who have been furloughed will have their statutory redundancy pay calculated based on their full-time wages as opposed their furloughed pay in the event that they are made redundant.

View blog

Return to work – all change or more of the same?

The Government has announced that its workplace guidance will change with effect from 1 August and its “work from home” message will be removed.

View blog

Will there be a return of employment tribunal fees?

The Government is reportedly considering the reinstatement of tribunal fees in respect of employment claims.

View blog

Redundancy: competitive interview processes

In this case, the Respondent’s appeal was unsuccessful. In the first instance, the decision that it unfairly dismissed various claimants following the closure of the school where they worked. The Claimants were unsuccessful in applying for substantially similar positions at a new school that opened at the same site. Read more here.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up