0370 270 6000

Motorola pushes Apple to suspend notification services

28 February 2012

On Saturday Apple suspended “push” notifications for its iCloud and MobileMe services in Germany. These allow consumers to receive updates from sources they subscribe to, often through downloading apps. The suspension follows a court ruling that Apple’s push technology infringes a Motorola patent originally used in pagers.

This is the latest skirmish in the ongoing patent litigation battle between a number of the biggest names in communications technology. Last week a Munich Court ordered Motorola to cease using the “slide to unlock” feature on all its future phones, after Apple successfully claimed a patent infringement by Motorola.

Phone companies place huge emphasis on ‘usability’, so court orders that prevent access to certain functions will be unsettling. Customers are unlikely to miss push notices much and will no doubt cope with whatever replaces “slide to unlock”. However, the patent disputes are likely to rumble on and customers will start to take notice if new phones miss functions they believe should come as standard.

  

Related opinions

The Future of Mediation

In an effort to build a stronger justice system, a shift in priorities has emerged away from adversarial court battles and more towards opportunities for consensual resolution. As one of the most popular forms of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), mediation has become increasingly encouraged.

View blog

Covid Rent Arrears: Cinema operators’ appeals dismissed

The Court of Appeal has dismissed two cases regarding rent arrears accrued during the Covid lockdowns. The cases are London Trocadero (2015) LLP v Picturehouse Cinemas Ltd and Bank of New York Mellon (International) Ltd v Cine-UK Ltd.

View blog

80% hours for 100% pay? That’ll do nicely

As has been widely reported this week, some 3,000 UK workers are taking part in a six month trial to assess the viability of a four-day working week without any reduction in their normal pay.

View blog

Are whistleblowers entitled to keep their employer’s confidential documents?

In Nissan v Passi, the High Court recently considered the issue of an employee retaining confidential documents belonging to his former employer in the context of the employer’s application for an injunction seeking the return of such documents from the employee.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up