Search Mobile

collapse

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

Email address

Password

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

collapseSign

Home

Insights

Resources

Blogs

Council wins turf war

council wins turf war

9 February 2011

In R (Barkas) v North Yorkshire County Council and Scarborough Council the High Court has upheld the decision of the local authority not to register a playing field, set out and maintained as a recreation ground under section 80 of the Housing Act 1936 (HA 1936), as a town or village green under the Commons Act 2006.

The application failed on the grounds that use of the field was “by right” and not “as of right”. The Court followed the obiter comments made in the House of Lords in R (Beresford) v Sunderland County Council [2003] UKHL 60 that use by virtue of a legal right is not use “as of right”.

The decision could therefore make land which has been laid out by local authorities under section 80 of the HA 1936 more attractive to developers, since entitlement to use the land under these sections will prevent registration of land as a town or village green under CA 2006.

related opinions

Chancellor announces levy on companies subject to anti-money laundering regulations

The Chancellor’s latest Budget Report outlined that the Government will introduce a £100 million Economic Crime Levy, otherwise known as the AML Levy no earlier than April 2022 to fund action to tackle money laundering and ensure delivery of reforms in the Government’s Economic Crime Plan.

View blog

Should heading the ball be banned in football?

A report by experts from the University of Glasgow looking at deaths caused by neurodegenerative disease in former professional footballers in Scotland.

View blog

Supreme Court provides comfort to public authorities facing village green applications

In a lengthy majority judgment accompanied by two powerful dissenting opinions, the Supreme Court found yesterday that land acquired and held for statutory purposes cannot be registered as a village green where that registration is incompatible with the statutory purpose for which it is held.

View blog