0370 270 6000

Another one bites the dust! Nokia successfully attacks another IPCom patent

22 February 2012

In the latest chapter in the long running telecoms patent dispute between Nokia and IPCom, the English High Court has ruled that IPCom’s European patent (UK), which related to the handover of mobile phones between different base stations (eg when the mobile user is on the move), was invalid as originally granted but allowed IPCom to amend its claims, so that the patent remains on the register.

Importantly for Nokia and other would-be licensees, the court found that the patent (even as amended) was not essential to the GSM, UMTS or LTE telecoms industry standards, so a licence of the patent is not required in order to comply with those standards.

Nokia will no doubt use this decision and others like it as leverage in future licence negotiations with IPCom. A victory for the licensee? Maybe, but the portfolio of patents owned and licensed by IPCom remains substantial, as highlighted on its website. Perhaps a convenience based licence still beckons….

Related opinions

The Future of Mediation

In an effort to build a stronger justice system, a shift in priorities has emerged away from adversarial court battles and more towards opportunities for consensual resolution. As one of the most popular forms of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), mediation has become increasingly encouraged.

View blog

Covid Rent Arrears: Cinema operators’ appeals dismissed

The Court of Appeal has dismissed two cases regarding rent arrears accrued during the Covid lockdowns. The cases are London Trocadero (2015) LLP v Picturehouse Cinemas Ltd and Bank of New York Mellon (International) Ltd v Cine-UK Ltd.

View blog

80% hours for 100% pay? That’ll do nicely

As has been widely reported this week, some 3,000 UK workers are taking part in a six month trial to assess the viability of a four-day working week without any reduction in their normal pay.

View blog

Are whistleblowers entitled to keep their employer’s confidential documents?

In Nissan v Passi, the High Court recently considered the issue of an employee retaining confidential documents belonging to his former employer in the context of the employer’s application for an injunction seeking the return of such documents from the employee.

View blog

Mark Daniels

Mark Daniels

Partner and Head of Business Services

View profile

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up