0370 270 6000

Security risk

9 January 2012

The risk of evaluating “irrelevant” information has been emphasised in the recent case of Resource v Northern Ireland Courts and Tribunals Service (NICTS) [2011] a tender for security and other services. The unsuccessful bidder claimed that NICTS had evaluated the part of G4S’ proposal which was different from the criteria set out in the Statement of Requirements instead of disregarding it as “irrelevant”.

The court agreed with the applicant. Firstly, NICTS did not have good evidence recording their evaluation process which in general is very important. Secondly, it was clear that G4S’ alternative proposals were taken into account which meant G4S received preferential treatment. By giving weight to “irrelevant” information the panel had committed a serious and manifest error.

The court set the award procedure aside. This case highlights once again the importance of evaluation based solely on the information available to all potential bidders and to record clearly the manner in which the evaluation criteria were applied.

Related opinions

IR35 rules to be scrapped from April 2023

The Chancellor’s recent mini-budget provided a significant announcement for business as it was confirmed that the off-payroll working rules (known as “IR35”) put in place for public and private sector businesses from 2017 and 2021 will be scrapped from April 2023.

View blog

Challenges from potential Foster Carers and Adopters

Our immediate future shows a renewed focus on foster care. We’re going to see a new nationwide-drive to recruit foster carers and the implementation of a more robust, and potentially financially-generous system for encouraging friends and family to care for their relatives (both when extended families cannot cope or provide care for any reason).

View blog

Unions bowled over by strike legislation

As of 21 July, two separate pieces of legislation came into force which seeks to mitigate against strike action. It should come as no surprise that this is a direct response to the rail strikes, which have dominated the news in the last couple of months.

View blog

No change to status tests

The Government has referred to the greater “clarity” provided by the Supreme Court’s decision in Uber BV and others v Aslam and others, considering it appropriate to allow the impact of this decision to take effect, before considering further intervention.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up