0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

security risk

9 January 2012

The risk of evaluating “irrelevant” information has been emphasised in the recent case of Resource v Northern Ireland Courts and Tribunals Service (NICTS) [2011] a tender for security and other services. The unsuccessful bidder claimed that NICTS had evaluated the part of G4S’ proposal which was different from the criteria set out in the Statement of Requirements instead of disregarding it as “irrelevant”.

The court agreed with the applicant. Firstly, NICTS did not have good evidence recording their evaluation process which in general is very important. Secondly, it was clear that G4S’ alternative proposals were taken into account which meant G4S received preferential treatment. By giving weight to “irrelevant” information the panel had committed a serious and manifest error.

The court set the award procedure aside. This case highlights once again the importance of evaluation based solely on the information available to all potential bidders and to record clearly the manner in which the evaluation criteria were applied.

related opinions

Legal fees for advising on settlement agreements

When entering into a settlement agreement, it is a requirement for the employee to get independent legal advice on the terms and effect of the agreement.

View blog

The Commons Treasury Committee has published its report on business rates. Are changes on the horizon?

The Treasury Committee has just published its report on its inquiry into the administration of business rates in England and, at first glance, it could be the catalyst to drive the change that many businesses have been calling for.

View blog

IR35 and the Issue of Control

The Upper Tribunal (UT) has considered the issue of control in the case of Christa Ackroyd Media Ltd –v- The Commissioners for HMRC and has upheld the decision of the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) that IR35 applied.

View blog

Vegetarianism is not a philosophical belief under the Equality Act 2010

In its Judgment earlier this month, the Tribunal considered whether vegetarianism is capable of being a philosophical belief capable of protection under the Equality Act 2010.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up