0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

judicial pension rights - O’Brien and the Advocate General’s opinion

29 November 2011

Whilst the final judgement is not anticipated until early 2012, Advocate General Kokott has now delivered her opinion.

Mr O’Brien, represented by Browne Jacobson LLP and Cloisters Chambers, brought a claim because, as a part-time, fee-paid judge, he was excluded from the judicial pension scheme. In July 2010 the Supreme Court sought ECJ input on:-

  • Can national law determine whether or not judges are “workers who have an employment contract or employment relationship”?
  • Can national law discriminate (a) between full time and part-time judges or (b) between different kinds of part-time judges in the provision of pensions?

The Advocate General considers that it is for national law to decide if a part-time judge is a worker, but there were limits to this discretion. Member States are not allowed to exclude complete categories of part-time worker.

The court does not need to follow the Advocate General’s opinion, but it unusual not to do so.

related opinions

The UK - India migration deal

The Young Professionals Scheme will make it easier for young Indian citizens and young Britons to access visas.

View blog

Home Office Central Registry for modern slavery statement goes live - first universities publish statements

The Home Office recently launched a central registry for modern slavery statements. A growing number of educational organisations, including a number of universities, have published statements on the registry.

View blog

Equal pay at ASDA stores - appeal to the Supreme Court unsuccessful

35,000 workers working in ASDA’s retail business sought to compare themselves to workers at distribution depots for equal pay purposes. Find out more about this Employment Appeal Tribunal.

View blog

Supreme Court confirms that sleep ins are not working time

The Supreme Court judgment represents the conclusion on whether or not “sleep in time” should be classified as working time, when calculating the National Minimum Wage (NMW).

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up