0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

judicial pension rights - O’Brien and the Advocate General’s opinion

29 November 2011

Whilst the final judgement is not anticipated until early 2012, Advocate General Kokott has now delivered her opinion.

Mr O’Brien, represented by Browne Jacobson LLP and Cloisters Chambers, brought a claim because, as a part-time, fee-paid judge, he was excluded from the judicial pension scheme. In July 2010 the Supreme Court sought ECJ input on:-

  • Can national law determine whether or not judges are “workers who have an employment contract or employment relationship”?
  • Can national law discriminate (a) between full time and part-time judges or (b) between different kinds of part-time judges in the provision of pensions?

The Advocate General considers that it is for national law to decide if a part-time judge is a worker, but there were limits to this discretion. Member States are not allowed to exclude complete categories of part-time worker.

The court does not need to follow the Advocate General’s opinion, but it unusual not to do so.

related opinions

Will there be a return of employment tribunal fees?

The Government is reportedly considering the reinstatement of tribunal fees in respect of employment claims.

View blog

Redundancy: competitive interview processes

In this case, the Respondent’s appeal was unsuccessful. In the first instance, the decision that it unfairly dismissed various claimants following the closure of the school where they worked. The Claimants were unsuccessful in applying for substantially similar positions at a new school that opened at the same site. Read more here.

View blog

Can an application to postpone a hearing be refused?

This case highlights the importance of Claimants obtaining their own medical evidence in such matters especially when it is pivotal to their claim.

View blog

Employer obliged to pay settlement despite employees confidentiality breach

In Duchy Farm Kennels Ltd v Steels the employer was found not to have been relieved of its obligation to pay a settlement sum, despite the former employee having breached the confidentiality clause contained in the settlement agreement.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up