0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Clegg backs protected conversations

28 October 2011

From leaked documents discussing scrapping unfair dismissal rules to announcements that the qualifying period for a claim is going to be upped to 2 years, it is clear that issues around dismissing staff are high on the Government’s agenda.

This theme has continued this week with an announcement from Nick Clegg that he plans for employers to be able to have ‘protected conversations’ with employees.  These are intended to be a way of allowing potentially uncomfortable discussions about performance management and retirement to happen without fear of being taken to an employment tribunal.

Many employers would agree that at times, the ‘cards on the table’ discussion could be a sensible way of managing a particular circumstance. However, what if such discussions contain discriminatory comments? Is it the Government’s intention that the employee would then be prohibited from referring to the discrimination in a tribunal?  Whether this idea will ever be workable in practice remains to be seen.

related opinions

Home Office Central Registry for modern slavery statement goes live - first universities publish statements

The Home Office recently launched a central registry for modern slavery statements. A growing number of educational organisations, including a number of universities, have published statements on the registry.

View blog

Equal pay at ASDA stores - appeal to the Supreme Court unsuccessful

35,000 workers working in ASDA’s retail business sought to compare themselves to workers at distribution depots for equal pay purposes. Find out more about this Employment Appeal Tribunal.

View blog

Supreme Court confirms that sleep ins are not working time

The Supreme Court judgment represents the conclusion on whether or not “sleep in time” should be classified as working time, when calculating the National Minimum Wage (NMW).

View blog

Mencap case: No entitlement to National Minimum Wage for sleep-in shifts

In a pivotal and much anticipated judgment for the social care sector, the Supreme Court has ruled that workers are not entitled to the National Minimum Wage for all time spent on a sleep-in shift.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up