0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

keeping pace with apprenticeships

17 August 2011

Numbers of apprenticeships have sky-rocketed fuelled by the governments drive to tackle massive youth unemployment but what are the implications?

The main purpose of an apprenticeship is to provide training; working is secondary. Apprentices have enjoyed additional rights compared to employees; premature termination of an apprenticeship can result in compensation for loss of wages, loss of training and loss of status.
However, from April 2011 apprenticeship agreements are to be regarded as contracts of employment under the Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Act 2009. In other words, an apprentice is to be treated as an employee – but only where the employer complies with certain conditions in the Act; including that the apprentice has a ‘prescribed form’ apprentice agreement. The problem is that employers may have to wait until 2013 to know what the prescribed form will look like!

In the meantime; employers should review their contracts with apprentices to ensure that they provide the requisite protection in the event that the apprenticeship has to be ended early. It remains to be seen what provisions the prescribed form apprenticeship agreement will include.

related opinions

World Menopause Day

To mark this, ACAS has produced new guidance for managing the menopause at work, providing advice on the symptoms and potential impact of the menopause and the types of support that can be offered.

View blog

Sexual Harassment in the workplace – consequences of getting it wrong

A partner at a Magic Circle law firm has this week been ordered to pay £235,000 in fines and costs by a disciplinary tribunal, having been found guilty of breaching his professional obligations.

View blog

High Court finds against WASPI women

The High Court has rejected the judicial review claim brought by the campaign group BackTo60 against the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP).

View blog

When does misconduct by a professional amount to professional misconduct?

The Court of Appeal has considered what amounts to professional conduct for the purposes of the MHPS in the case of Idu –v- The East Suffolk & North Essex NHS Foundation Trust.
The allegations raised against the Appellant surgeon included, amongst others, refusals to follow management instructions and inappropriate (rude, uncivil, and, on occasions, aggressive) verbal and written communications.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up