0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

breaking the glass ceiling

5 August 2011

Theresa May and Business Secretary Vince Cable recently sent out a letter to all FTSE 350 companies setting out the business case for increasing the representation of women in senior positions. It quoted figures which show that companies with more women on their boards outperform their rivals.

Before the stampede to fill their boards with women, employers should remember that the Equality Act stopped short of allowing positive discrimination. What it does permit is positive action to encourage an increase in representation where minorities exist. Positive action is limited to very particular circumstances, including when the man and woman are equally qualified.

The government will be hoping that this guidance will encourage firms to promote more women to senior positions, without the need to pass additional legislation. However, as the law currently stands, firms will need to be careful if they wish to promote based on gender rather than competency, as this could lead to claims of discrimination from male candidates.

related opinions

Furloughed employees entitled to full pay for redundancy purposes

The government has brought in new legislation to ensure that any employees who have been furloughed will have their statutory redundancy pay calculated based on their full-time wages as opposed their furloughed pay in the event that they are made redundant.

View blog

Return to work – all change or more of the same?

The Government has announced that its workplace guidance will change with effect from 1 August and its “work from home” message will be removed.

View blog

Will there be a return of employment tribunal fees?

The Government is reportedly considering the reinstatement of tribunal fees in respect of employment claims.

View blog

Redundancy: competitive interview processes

In this case, the Respondent’s appeal was unsuccessful. In the first instance, the decision that it unfairly dismissed various claimants following the closure of the school where they worked. The Claimants were unsuccessful in applying for substantially similar positions at a new school that opened at the same site. Read more here.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up