0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

wait continues for critical TUPE decision

17 June 2011

The Supreme Court has referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union Parkwood Leisure Ltd v Alemo-Herron on an issue about collective agreements on a TUPE transfer.

Certain terms of employment including pay rates were determined by nationally negotiated collective agreements between local authorities and the relevant unions. The question is: do changes to such collective agreements made after a TUPE transfer bind the transferee (‘dynamic’ interpretation), or does the transferee only have to comply with the terms of the collective agreement at the time of the transfer (‘static’ interpretation).

Muddled case law sits behind this. The ECJ have used the static interpretation (Werhof v Freeway Traffic Systems); domestic courts (Whent v T Cartledge Ltd) have taken the dynamic approach.

The Claimants will say their contracts entitle them to any changes made by collective agreements post-transfer (including pay increases). The employers will argue that is unfair because they have no say in what those changes are.

related opinions

The UK - India migration deal

The Young Professionals Scheme will make it easier for young Indian citizens and young Britons to access visas.

View blog

Home Office Central Registry for modern slavery statement goes live - first universities publish statements

The Home Office recently launched a central registry for modern slavery statements. A growing number of educational organisations, including a number of universities, have published statements on the registry.

View blog

Equal pay at ASDA stores - appeal to the Supreme Court unsuccessful

35,000 workers working in ASDA’s retail business sought to compare themselves to workers at distribution depots for equal pay purposes. Find out more about this Employment Appeal Tribunal.

View blog

Supreme Court confirms that sleep ins are not working time

The Supreme Court judgment represents the conclusion on whether or not “sleep in time” should be classified as working time, when calculating the National Minimum Wage (NMW).

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up