0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

wait continues for critical TUPE decision

17 June 2011

The Supreme Court has referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union Parkwood Leisure Ltd v Alemo-Herron on an issue about collective agreements on a TUPE transfer.

Certain terms of employment including pay rates were determined by nationally negotiated collective agreements between local authorities and the relevant unions. The question is: do changes to such collective agreements made after a TUPE transfer bind the transferee (‘dynamic’ interpretation), or does the transferee only have to comply with the terms of the collective agreement at the time of the transfer (‘static’ interpretation).

Muddled case law sits behind this. The ECJ have used the static interpretation (Werhof v Freeway Traffic Systems); domestic courts (Whent v T Cartledge Ltd) have taken the dynamic approach.

The Claimants will say their contracts entitle them to any changes made by collective agreements post-transfer (including pay increases). The employers will argue that is unfair because they have no say in what those changes are.

related opinions

Will there be a return of employment tribunal fees?

The Government is reportedly considering the reinstatement of tribunal fees in respect of employment claims.

View blog

Redundancy: competitive interview processes

In this case, the Respondent’s appeal was unsuccessful. In the first instance, the decision that it unfairly dismissed various claimants following the closure of the school where they worked. The Claimants were unsuccessful in applying for substantially similar positions at a new school that opened at the same site. Read more here.

View blog

Can an application to postpone a hearing be refused?

This case highlights the importance of Claimants obtaining their own medical evidence in such matters especially when it is pivotal to their claim.

View blog

Employer obliged to pay settlement despite employees confidentiality breach

In Duchy Farm Kennels Ltd v Steels the employer was found not to have been relieved of its obligation to pay a settlement sum, despite the former employee having breached the confidentiality clause contained in the settlement agreement.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up