The waiting game

0370 270 6000

Search Mobile

collapse

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

Email address

Password

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

collapseSign

Home

Insights

Resources

Blogs

The waiting game

21 June 2011

The process of reforming the legal funding regime began in earnest today with the publication of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill.

Well we’ve waited and waited and now we’ve seen the Bill. And? Well it’s still an anti climax and leaves some uncertainty. Whilst it is envisaged that success fees and after the event premiums will not be recoverable from a losing party in civil proceedings, we’ll have to wait for Order of the Lord Chancellor to find out the detail.

Success fees will be subject to a maximum limit and will apply only to the damages specified by the Lord Chancellor. It’s also made clear that this will not apply retrospectively. We also have the introduction of damages based agreements, aka contingency fees.

Given that matters will now be dealt with by the Lord Chancellor will we now see a judicial review of this issue? When will we finally receive a timescale for the implementation? This state of flux is confusing and unhelpful for everyone.

Related opinions

Valuing a claim following professional negligence

Mrs Jean Edwards v Hugh James Ford Simey (a Firm) (2018 EWCA) is an interesting case involving solicitor’s negligence in the bringing of a disease claim under a vibration white finger scheme against the Department of Trade and Industry by the estate of a former miner.

View blog

Fundamental dishonesty – surveillance instrumental in securing dismissal under s.57 CJCA

In Peter Stanton v Henry Hunter Recorder Hatfield QC found that the claimant, who had knowingly provided false instructions to medical experts and had been shown in surveillance evidence to have returned to work with no limitation of movement in his left shoulder as alleged, had been fundamentally dishonest.

View blog

Are your communications with an expert disclosable?

The Court has ruled in the case of Allen Tod Architecture Ltd (C) v Capita Property and Infrastructure Ltd (D) [2016] EWHC 2171 (TCC) that as a condition of being granted permission to instruct a new expert (having lost confidence in the first expert instructed) C had to provide disclosure of the first expert’s preliminary report.

View blog