0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

hearsay evidence

23 June 2011

A paediatric cardiologist facing allegations of sexual abuse has been successful in stopping the General Medical Council using hearsay evidence in disciplinary proceedings. The allegations relate to when he worked in Kenya. A key witness lived in Kenya, and while he was willing to travel to the disciplinary hearings, the GMC decided that the risk to the individual flowing from public exposure in homosexual activity outweighed the benefit of his personal attendance.

The High Court felt this decision was irrational. The stakes could not be higher for the cardiologist, both personally and professionally, and it was essential that he was given the opportunity to cross-examine the witness.

This decision is likely to be very influential in future disciplinary proceedings. It shows that in cases where sexual abuse is alleged, it is very important to allow the alleged perpetrator to challenge the allegations. While disciplinary proceedings tend not to have the formality or consequences of court action, nevertheless similar procedural safeguards must apply.

related opinions

High Court finds against WASPI women

The High Court has rejected the judicial review claim brought by the campaign group BackTo60 against the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP).

View blog

When does misconduct by a professional amount to professional misconduct?

The Court of Appeal has considered what amounts to professional conduct for the purposes of the MHPS in the case of Idu –v- The East Suffolk & North Essex NHS Foundation Trust.
The allegations raised against the Appellant surgeon included, amongst others, refusals to follow management instructions and inappropriate (rude, uncivil, and, on occasions, aggressive) verbal and written communications.

View blog

Vegetarianism is not a philosophical belief under the Equality Act 2010

In its Judgment earlier this month, the Tribunal considered whether vegetarianism is capable of being a philosophical belief capable of protection under the Equality Act 2010.

View blog

Time to increase the £25,000 cap on contractual claims in the Employment Tribunal?

The recent case of Ugradar v Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust has highlighted that the current cap on contractual claims that can be awarded in the Employment Tribunals is outdated and capable of producing real injustice.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up