0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

hearsay evidence

23 June 2011

A paediatric cardiologist facing allegations of sexual abuse has been successful in stopping the General Medical Council using hearsay evidence in disciplinary proceedings. The allegations relate to when he worked in Kenya. A key witness lived in Kenya, and while he was willing to travel to the disciplinary hearings, the GMC decided that the risk to the individual flowing from public exposure in homosexual activity outweighed the benefit of his personal attendance.

The High Court felt this decision was irrational. The stakes could not be higher for the cardiologist, both personally and professionally, and it was essential that he was given the opportunity to cross-examine the witness.

This decision is likely to be very influential in future disciplinary proceedings. It shows that in cases where sexual abuse is alleged, it is very important to allow the alleged perpetrator to challenge the allegations. While disciplinary proceedings tend not to have the formality or consequences of court action, nevertheless similar procedural safeguards must apply.

related opinions

The UK - India migration deal

The Young Professionals Scheme will make it easier for young Indian citizens and young Britons to access visas.

View blog

Home Office Central Registry for modern slavery statement goes live - first universities publish statements

The Home Office recently launched a central registry for modern slavery statements. A growing number of educational organisations, including a number of universities, have published statements on the registry.

View blog

Equal pay at ASDA stores - appeal to the Supreme Court unsuccessful

35,000 workers working in ASDA’s retail business sought to compare themselves to workers at distribution depots for equal pay purposes. Find out more about this Employment Appeal Tribunal.

View blog

Supreme Court confirms that sleep ins are not working time

The Supreme Court judgment represents the conclusion on whether or not “sleep in time” should be classified as working time, when calculating the National Minimum Wage (NMW).

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up