0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

employer liable for the harassment of care staff by children

28 June 2011

Last week saw a particularly challenging employment appeal tribunal decision for local authorities and managers in the care sector. An Iranian residential social worker successfully held his employer liable for acts of racial harassment carried out by an extremely challenging child. It was found that the employer was liable under the Race Relations Act 1976.

The tribunal concluded that the employer had known the employee had his accent mocked and that the child said he should go “back home”. The tribunal also decided that the local authority had not acted to put in effective measures to prevent the behaviour. The behaviour was harassment for which the employer was liable given its inaction.

The tribunal dismissed the argument that the child’s underlying intention was to challenge authority and was thus not racially motivated. This decision has important consequences for managers in the health and care sector, whether working with challenging children or the elderly.

related opinions

Anti-social media - but when is it work related?

As the use of social media continues to increase, its overlap with working life is becoming more and more prevalent.

View blog

IR35 changes - six months and counting...

In his 2018 Autumn Budget, the then Chancellor, Phillip Hammond, announced a significant change to the way liability for IR35 breaches will be dealt with for private sector companies from April 2020.

View blog

Court of Appeal confirms all employment tribunal judgments must be published on the register, except in national security cases

Under the ET Rules, all judgments and accompanying written reasons must be published on a pubic register which the general public can access online.

View blog

Supreme Court backs employers seeking to enforce restrictive covenants: Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd

The Supreme Court in Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd has determined that where post-termination restrictive covenants (i.e. “non-compete” clauses) in employment contracts go further than reasonably necessary to protect an employer’s business interests, it can apply the ‘blue pencil test,’ severing the offending words and leaving the remaining enforceable clause in place.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up