0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

celebrity chef goes from frying pan into fire

12 May 2011

From Max Mosley to Andrew Marr, debate rages about the extent to which famous people should be able to use court orders to prevent their dirty laundry being aired in public.

Now there are reports that a well-known celebrity chef has obtained a gagging order to prevent details of employment tribunal proceedings against him by two former employees being published in the press.

A ‘restricted reporting order’ (as employment tribunals like to call them) can be applied for by either party in a case involving allegations of sexual misconduct, or by the claimant in a disability discrimination case, and prevents the parties to proceedings being named in the press. Unlike the so called “super injunction”, restricted reporting orders are not normally controversial, as they cease to have effect once the case has been determined by the Employment Tribunal. So for those who do not watch celebrity chef programmes and so do not already know how they behave, the full story could still be published once judgment is given.

related opinions

Anti-social media - but when is it work related?

As the use of social media continues to increase, its overlap with working life is becoming more and more prevalent.

View blog

IR35 changes - six months and counting...

In his 2018 Autumn Budget, the then Chancellor, Phillip Hammond, announced a significant change to the way liability for IR35 breaches will be dealt with for private sector companies from April 2020.

View blog

Court of Appeal confirms all employment tribunal judgments must be published on the register, except in national security cases

Under the ET Rules, all judgments and accompanying written reasons must be published on a pubic register which the general public can access online.

View blog

Supreme Court backs employers seeking to enforce restrictive covenants: Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd

The Supreme Court in Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd has determined that where post-termination restrictive covenants (i.e. “non-compete” clauses) in employment contracts go further than reasonably necessary to protect an employer’s business interests, it can apply the ‘blue pencil test,’ severing the offending words and leaving the remaining enforceable clause in place.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up