0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Be careful what you say about former employees

9 May 2011

Employers have long been liable to employees for financial loss caused by an inaccurate reference. In McKie v Swindon College the High Court has extended the principle beyond the giving of a reference.

His new job at Bath City College brought Mr McKie in to contact with his former employer, Swindon College. Swindon gave him a glowing reference when he left in 2002 but in 2008 Swindon’s HR manager wrote an email to his opposite number at Bath saying they wouldn’t accept Mr McKie on their premises as there were safeguarding concerns about him.

The Court described the email as “largely fallacious and untrue.” Bath summarily dismissed Mr McKie as a result of the email and, as a result of the court’s decision, will be able to recover his financial loss from Swindon.

Related opinions

Symptoms of menopause can constitute a disability

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) recently found that an employment tribunal was wrong to strike out a claim on grounds that menopausal symptoms did not amount to a disability under the Equality Act 2010 (Rooney v Leicester City Council).

View blog

Employment Appeal Tribunal rules no entitlement to pay for zero-hour worker during a period of suspension

In a recent case the Employment Appeal Tribunal determined that, as a zero-hour worker, the Claimant was not entitled to be paid whilst he was suspended pending an investigation into an allegation of misconduct.

View blog

Flexible working and leave for carers

The Government has launched a consultation today on potential changes to the statutory flexible working regime.

View blog

Importance of considering flexible working applications

An employment tribunal has awarded an employee almost £185,000 for indirect discrimination following a failure to adequately consider the employee’s flexible working request.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up