Please sign in with your existing account details.
Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.
Privacy statement - Terms and conditions
Forgotten your password?
You have exceeded the maximum number of login attempts for this email address and your account has been locked. An email has been sent to member of Browne Jacobson's web team and some one will be contacting you over the next two working days with details of how to change your password.
Are you sure you want to remove this item from you pinned content?
Do you need to tell the (potential) buyer about the future threat to the business? If you want to avoid a claim for misrepresentation you do… or risk unlimited liability.
A case on 20th April this year has confirmed the position at English law that silence (when you know an honest statement is no longer true) can amount to fraudulent misrepresentation.
It’s not the first such case to make this point (as anyone who attends our regular in house lawyers forums will be aware) but it does place the bar higher for sellers of businesses, who must balance the threat to the sale against the (very real) threat of a claim, in respect of which they will not be able to limit liability.
The courts have long recognised that, on a societal level, women bear a greater burden of childcare responsibilities than men which can make it more difficult for women to comply with employer requirements for flexible working (known as the ‘childcare disparity’).
View blog
Yesterday’s announcement already seems to be a seminal moment on the road to recovery from the impacts of the pandemic. Here are some of the headline points.
In Sethi v Elements Personnel Services Limited, the Employment Tribunal has considered the implications of dress codes on men.
In a lengthy majority judgment accompanied by two powerful dissenting opinions, the Supreme Court found yesterday that land acquired and held for statutory purposes cannot be registered as a village green where that registration is incompatible with the statutory purpose for which it is held.
Partner and Responsible for In House Lawyers
Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.
Sign up