0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

re Uniq plc – hopefully not unique!

1 April 2011

The Uniq plc case opens a door to a brighter future for employers sponsoring defined benefit schemes facing large deficits.

In this recent case the High Court approved the ground-breaking arrangement of a pension deficit for equity swap. This decision could pave the way for other employers looking to manage their defined benefit pension liabilities.

Whilst this may not be a cure for all, it certainly is a sound beginning and will no doubt be explored by many employers wanting to be released from their financial obligations to their defined benefit scheme and avoid insolvency.

By virtue of a regulated apportionment arrangement and a complex restructuring involving the employers, pension scheme trustees and the Pension Protection Fund (PPF), Uniq plc has been released from its employer pension debt liability in exchange for giving the trustees a large stake in the company. The shareholding is then held on charitable trust under a new corporate entity, which has entered administration with the pension scheme entering a PPF assessment period.

related opinions

Anti-social media - but when is it work related?

As the use of social media continues to increase, its overlap with working life is becoming more and more prevalent.

View blog

IR35 changes - six months and counting...

In his 2018 Autumn Budget, the then Chancellor, Phillip Hammond, announced a significant change to the way liability for IR35 breaches will be dealt with for private sector companies from April 2020.

View blog

Court of Appeal confirms all employment tribunal judgments must be published on the register, except in national security cases

Under the ET Rules, all judgments and accompanying written reasons must be published on a pubic register which the general public can access online.

View blog

Supreme Court backs employers seeking to enforce restrictive covenants: Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd

The Supreme Court in Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd has determined that where post-termination restrictive covenants (i.e. “non-compete” clauses) in employment contracts go further than reasonably necessary to protect an employer’s business interests, it can apply the ‘blue pencil test,’ severing the offending words and leaving the remaining enforceable clause in place.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up