0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

positive action in recruitment and promotion – will your business use it?

18 April 2011

Employers can now lawfully treat one person more favourably than another when in connection with recruitment or promotion because they have a protected characteristic (although they are not obliged to).

This is, however, subject to a number of limitations and employers can only do so if the candidates are of equal merit. Employers will therefore have to ensure their rating criteria are capable of demonstrating this.

The employer is also required to ‘reasonably think’ that those with a protected characteristic are under-represented in the workforce or suffer a disadvantage connected to that characteristic. This must be supported by evidence.

The employer can only legally discriminate if to do so is a proportionate way of achieving the above aims.

Failure to demonstrate any of the above could lead to a claim for discrimination against the employer, which means, with so many uncertainties and only limited advantages, there is little business case for using the new powers.

related opinions

Will there be a return of employment tribunal fees?

The Government is reportedly considering the reinstatement of tribunal fees in respect of employment claims.

View blog

Redundancy: competitive interview processes

In this case, the Respondent’s appeal was unsuccessful. In the first instance, the decision that it unfairly dismissed various claimants following the closure of the school where they worked. The Claimants were unsuccessful in applying for substantially similar positions at a new school that opened at the same site. Read more here.

View blog

Can an application to postpone a hearing be refused?

This case highlights the importance of Claimants obtaining their own medical evidence in such matters especially when it is pivotal to their claim.

View blog

Employer obliged to pay settlement despite employees confidentiality breach

In Duchy Farm Kennels Ltd v Steels the employer was found not to have been relieved of its obligation to pay a settlement sum, despite the former employee having breached the confidentiality clause contained in the settlement agreement.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up