0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

positive action in recruitment and promotion – will your business use it?

18 April 2011

Employers can now lawfully treat one person more favourably than another when in connection with recruitment or promotion because they have a protected characteristic (although they are not obliged to).

This is, however, subject to a number of limitations and employers can only do so if the candidates are of equal merit. Employers will therefore have to ensure their rating criteria are capable of demonstrating this.

The employer is also required to ‘reasonably think’ that those with a protected characteristic are under-represented in the workforce or suffer a disadvantage connected to that characteristic. This must be supported by evidence.

The employer can only legally discriminate if to do so is a proportionate way of achieving the above aims.

Failure to demonstrate any of the above could lead to a claim for discrimination against the employer, which means, with so many uncertainties and only limited advantages, there is little business case for using the new powers.

related opinions

Anti-social media - but when is it work related?

As the use of social media continues to increase, its overlap with working life is becoming more and more prevalent.

View blog

IR35 changes - six months and counting...

In his 2018 Autumn Budget, the then Chancellor, Phillip Hammond, announced a significant change to the way liability for IR35 breaches will be dealt with for private sector companies from April 2020.

View blog

Court of Appeal confirms all employment tribunal judgments must be published on the register, except in national security cases

Under the ET Rules, all judgments and accompanying written reasons must be published on a pubic register which the general public can access online.

View blog

Supreme Court backs employers seeking to enforce restrictive covenants: Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd

The Supreme Court in Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd has determined that where post-termination restrictive covenants (i.e. “non-compete” clauses) in employment contracts go further than reasonably necessary to protect an employer’s business interests, it can apply the ‘blue pencil test,’ severing the offending words and leaving the remaining enforceable clause in place.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up