Please sign in with your existing account details.
Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.
Privacy statement - Terms and conditions
Forgotten your password?
You have exceeded the maximum number of login attempts for this email address and your account has been locked. An email has been sent to member of Browne Jacobson's web team and some one will be contacting you over the next two working days with details of how to change your password.
Are you sure you want to remove this item from you pinned content?
There have been reports that the 3D effect on Nintendo’s new flagship console, the 3DS, may make certain users feel sick. Nintendo are aware of this possibility, and prudently advise users to take a break after 30 minutes of gaming. The 3D can also be turned off. But we know it can be difficult for companies to regulate how their consumer products are used.
Not all retailers are offering a full refund to users who return the console for this reason. The stores are taking the line that as the individual units are not “faulty,” the goods are fit for purpose and so comply with the Sales of Goods Act 1979.
If a product is not “safe” for its foreseeable use, then we think it cannot be “fit for purpose” – but whether this applies to the 3DS will only be answered if the issue is litigated, by a consumer or by Trading Standards.
Even if the stores are right, this negative PR will undoubtedly harm the product’s sales.
Draft legislation has already been produced to replicate the 2017 IR35 changes within the public sector and extend these to medium and large private sector organisations, with the final legislation previously expected this month.
View blog
The University of Edinburgh has been fined £10,000 for allowing animal research workers to be exposed to laboratory animal allergens “LAA”.
Following a consultation last year on a draft form, the Department for Education (DfE) has now published extensive guidance for schools and colleges in relation to security.
A recent decision by the Supreme Court in Shanks v Unilever PLC has supported the right for employees to receive compensation for patented inventions if the invention is of ‘outstanding benefit’.
Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.
Sign up