0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

vetting and CRBs – the Freedoms Bill out today

11 February 2011

Eight months after announcing that a review of the Independent Safeguarding Authority (ISA) and the CRB requirements would take place, the government looks set to announce its findings as part of the Freedoms Bill later today.

Current reports suggest that the ISA and CRB systems will be merged, the registration requirement will be scrapped completely and the requirement to vet casual volunteers will be scaled back considerably. The government has also reacted to the Court of Appeal decision in Desmond –v- Chief Constable of Nottinghamshire (2001) by confirming that CRB information is sent to the individual before the employer so that errors can be corrected.

As expected, the review looks set to focus only on the vetting requirements and ignore the barring powers of the ISA and the legal duty placed on those working with children and vulnerable adults to refer conduct to the ISA.

When the Bill is published later today we will have a better idea of where the scheme is going. As soon as we see it, we will provide further comment.

related opinions

IR35 changes - six months and counting...

In his 2018 Autumn Budget, the then Chancellor, Phillip Hammond, announced a significant change to the way liability for IR35 breaches will be dealt with for private sector companies from April 2020.

View blog

Marriott International: a look behind the ICO’s £99m fine and what this means for corporate acquisitions

Last month, the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) announced notice of its intention to fine (NOI) Marriott International, Inc. £99m for infringements of the GDPR.

View blog

Supreme Court backs employers seeking to enforce restrictive covenants: Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd

The Supreme Court in Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd has determined that where post-termination restrictive covenants (i.e. “non-compete” clauses) in employment contracts go further than reasonably necessary to protect an employer’s business interests, it can apply the ‘blue pencil test,’ severing the offending words and leaving the remaining enforceable clause in place.

View blog

Watch this space on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility

The concept of Assumption of Responsibility is on many stakeholders’ minds at the moment following the Supreme Court decision in CN & GN v Poole.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up